Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT), lu6etj
wrote: As it was taught to me (I am not physicist), quantum nature of a 80 m wavelenght energy it is useless for calculations and invisible to our instrument resolution because its immensely large quantic number. Is it wrong? Yes. We experience 80M activity every day irrespective of it being Newtonian or Quantum. All it reveals is that something with a very, very, very low energy is still quite measurable. However, you "can" deliberately choose the wrong instrument to measure the energy. That instrument reveals more about the choice-maker than the energy. For instance, a 1KW 80M energy source presents a near 0 degree absolute temperature. A fever thermometer is not going to register that energy. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflected Energy | Antenna | |||
Reflected power ? | Antenna |