Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 13, 6:09*pm, Richard Fry wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:33*pm, walt wrote: The point I'm emphasizing is that because the output resistance of these amps is non- dissipative, no reflected power from a mismatched load enters the amp, but is totally re-reflected in the forward direction. Walt, wouldn't that non-dissipative output resistance also reflect reverse power on other close frequencies, such as those coupled from a co-located transmission system within the bandwidth of the tx output network? If so, such external signals would never enter the transmitter, and could not cause r-f intermodulation by mixing with the main signal in the (non-linear) PA plate circuit of that transmitter to produce a 3rd order product *at *2F1 *- F2, and other combinations. But such r-f intermods are a fact of life, as shown in the Mendenhall paper, and in the existence of elaborate and expensive r-f filtering hardware needed to enable several stations to operate from one location while meeting a radiated r-f intermod spec of -80 dBc -- even from one antenna! RF Richard, I'm not qualified to answer your question about intermods, so I won't even try. However, interference to the amp from radiation from an antenna driven by another amp will not be phase or frequency coherent with the tx receiving the interference. Perhaps that's the reason the interfering signal gets through while the waves reflected from a mismatch don't? In other words, could the coherent relationship between the forward and reflected waves result in the total re- reflection at the non-dissipative output resistance of waves returning from the mismatched load? Walt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|