Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious if this has ever been done? I'm thinking about
putting up a 90 foot dipole feed with homemade open wire line. I'd like to bring it into the shack using paralled runs of LMR-400 cable, since the final 25 feet is via 3" electrical conduit that also has rotor and other cables. I believe the parallel cables with give me a 100 ohm impedance. The open wire will be using #10 with homemade spreaders, I'm going to try for 600 ohms at the feedpoint. I was wondering if tapering the spacing on the feedline would give me a smoother impedance where the open wire, arrestor, and twin coax arrange- meet? Yes, it has been done. Jasik's "Antenna Engineering Handbook" discusses tapered lines in section 31.4. You can also find a discussion of tapered-line matching in Laport's "Radio Antenna Engineering" in section 4.4.8 (this book is available as a free PDF download). In your application, though, I'm not sure why you would want to bother. Traditionally, tapered lines are used as part of a matching network, making a transition between two known resistive impedances (e.g. transmitter and antenna). That's not really the situation you seem to be setting up. You are (I presume) setting up a single doublet, to be used at multiple frequencies, with wildly varying impedances at the antenna feedpoint. You're then coming back to the shack with a high-impedance feedline (which has relatively low losses even at the high SWRs it'll be operating at), and then matching the impedance in the shack with a good transmatch-and-balun. In a setup like this, the characteristic impedance of the open-wire line isn't particularly critical.. because it'll almost never be a close match to what the antenna is presenting at any given frequency. 600 ohms is a common feedline impedance... but no matter what impedance you choose here, it's unlikely to be a close match to the antenna under actual operating conditions. As a result, the impedance you actually "see" looking up into the lower end of the open-wire line won't be 600 ohms (if untapered) or 100 ohms (if tapered down close together). Rather, it'll be the feedpoint impedance of the antenna at the frequency in question, transformed by the feedline (tapered or not). You could calculate it, knowing the antenna's feedpoint impedance (e.g. from modeling it in NEC2) and the length and Z of the feedline... but it isn't likely to be close to a convenient pure resistance except by lucky chance! Hence, there's no real need to "match" the lower Z of the parallel- coax segment (100 ohms nominal) to Z of the open-wire line, since the latter value isn't actually what you'd have to match to! Now, if you're planning to operate at a specific single frequency, you could perhaps utilize a tapered open-wire line as part of a tuned matching setup... in effect, designing the taper for that one antenna and frequency, in order to present a more convenient impedance to your transmitter's matching network (e.g. your external wide-range transmatch). However, optimizing the system in this way, for one specific frequency, might well make the antenna-and-feedline a *harder* load for you to match in the shack at other frequencies. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open wire feedline | Antenna | |||
OPEN WIRE LINE | Antenna | |||
Open wire feedlines | General | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment | |||
WTB: 2" open wire spreaders | Equipment |