On Jul 7, 11:14*am, Keith Dysart wrote:
On Jul 6, 11:11*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:

On Jul 6, 7:27*pm, Keith Dysart wrote:

Excellent attempt at diversion.

Sorry, "I don't know", is NOT a diversion.

T'is when the thing you claim not to know has nothing to do with
the problem at hand.

As i pointed out, the energy levels are well above the noise.

And you skipped the intriguing question...

If the signal was a 50 W sinusoid at 15 nHz, would you have the
same reluctance to declare it an EM wave? It is a sinusoid.
What criteria could it possibly fail to satisfy?

At what frequency would you no longer be reluctanct?
* 1 microHz
* 1 mHz
* 0.1 Hz
* 1 Hz
* 10 Hz
* 100 Hz
* 1 kHz
* 10 kHz
* ?

Real applications run at 10 kHz so I assume you would accept,
without concern, at least this number. Where would your
trepidation begin?

...Keith

i have trepidation when it takes longer to reach steady state than i
am willing to sit and watch the experiment.

On Jul 8, 10:51*am, K1TTT wrote:
i have trepidation when it takes longer to reach steady state than i
am willing to sit and watch the experiment.

For some reason, Keith prefers living in the theoretical world rather
than the real world. His idea of reality is what his math model
subliminally tells him to believe. He doesn't seem to know that
reality is supposed to dictate math models, not vice-versa. :-)

P.S. Let's go card-counting.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com