Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Slim Jim v J Pole
Sal M. Onella Inscribed thus:
On Jul 15, 12:33Â*pm, Baron wrote: Peter Inscribed thus: Hi all I have just modelled both the Slim Jim antenna and J Pole antenna using MMANA-GAL at the same frequency (145MHz) all other parameter equal and was some what surprised that they appear exhibit the same gain and radiation pattern. Based on an article I read in a English magazine many years ago I have always believed the Slim Jim had a slight edge over the J Pole. Wonder if others had a similar view and if my modelling is correct are there any advantages with the Slim Jim design? The difference is negligible. They both suffer from unbalanced feed currents and thus feeder radiation. Â*There is or was a commercial design that attempted to reduce that. 73's -- Best Regards: Baron. I only did it once but the j-pole design papers often call for the feedline to be coiled tightly -- a few turns -- just below the feed point. I have made and used several of these "choke baluns" for HF because failure to use a balun seems to screw up my VSWR readings. Does this strictly apply to 2m j-poles, too? I don't know. "Sal" (KD6VKW) A few (2 - 4) ferrite beads, the sort used on the glass computer monitor video lead, works very well slipped over the co-ax just below the bottom of the J. Best of all you can get them for free... -- Best Regards: Baron. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help with slim jim nec model | Antenna | |||
J-Pole vs Slim Jim? | Antenna | |||
Slim Jim vs. EZNEC | Antenna | |||
Helical wound slim jim? | Antenna | |||
Anyone here of a "SLim Jim" antenna? | Antenna |