Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?" Since this is a 1/2 wave
antenna with a 1/4 matching section (3/4 overall), helical winding of this form into a 3/8 overall height (approx. 12 ft. @ 28Mhz) might be possible. The extremely low angle of radiation (approx. 8 degrees) would make this vertical antenna desirable... Regards |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:18:39 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote: The extremely low angle of radiation Hi John, Rote learning comes through repetition: The physical size in relation to wavelength dominates launch characteristics, NOT electrical length. As slim jims are generally applied to UHF/VHF use, line of sight dominates both - that is why helically wound resistors (HT rubber duckies) work as well as they do. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:37:12 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote: The rubber duckie antenna is certainly useful for some situations, however, it is better if it stays on the walkie-talkie and we use another design for portable or base use. Hi John, Given this opprobrium, what makes its cousin for 20M more suitable? [20M is not noted for being line-of-sight either.] The principle annoyance to erecting antennas is in matching them, beyond that, any radiator from 0.1 to 0.625 wavelengths pretty much has the same gain in the same direction. The difference being that some are harder to interface to a transmitter than others. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, have you ever built any antennas? I know it is tempting to go buy a
standard issue one and ask everyone else why they bother, sometimes, I am even tempted myself... Regards "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:37:12 -0800, "John Smith" wrote: The rubber duckie antenna is certainly useful for some situations, however, it is better if it stays on the walkie-talkie and we use another design for portable or base use. Hi John, Given this opprobrium, what makes its cousin for 20M more suitable? [20M is not noted for being line-of-sight either.] The principle annoyance to erecting antennas is in matching them, beyond that, any radiator from 0.1 to 0.625 wavelengths pretty much has the same gain in the same direction. The difference being that some are harder to interface to a transmitter than others. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:43:53 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote: Hey, have you ever built any antennas? Hi John, Hoist your own petard, bucko. I display my call, I am among my peers and do not post anonymously (not that your veil hasn't been penetrated Brett). Now, the question again: Given this opprobrium, what makes its cousin for 20M more suitable? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rather, back to my original question (your ADD--attention defecit disorder
is showing), "Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?"" Regards "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:43:53 -0800, "John Smith" wrote: Hey, have you ever built any antennas? Hi John, Hoist your own petard, bucko. I display my call, I am among my peers and do not post anonymously (not that your veil hasn't been penetrated Brett). Now, the question again: Given this opprobrium, what makes its cousin for 20M more suitable? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:00:30 -0800, "John Smith"
wrote: Rather, back to my original question (your ADD--attention defecit disorder is showing), "Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?"" Hi "Jack," I suppose it has to be said if this is going anywhe Yes. Is this 20 questions, or do you have any answers for yourself? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Clark" wrote:
... any radiator from 0.1 to 0.625 wavelengths pretty much has the same gain in the same direction. ________________ This will be news to the FCC and AM broadcast stations, all of whom understand that the ground wave from radiators of the heights you mention above varies WIDELY, as demonstrated by empirical measurements going back some 70 years. For example, a 0.1 lambda radiator has about 54% of the groundwave field as one of 0.625 wavelength, assuming a very good ground system for each (1 ohm or so). A matched radiator of 0.1 lambda height would need about 3-1/2X as much input power as a 0.625 lambda matched radiator in order to generate the same ground wave field strength over the same radio path. RF |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:29:59 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote: This will be news to the FCC and AM broadcast stations Hi OM, Send them a singing telegram. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
.....Anyone ever done a helical wound "Slim Jim?"
yes. Since this is a 1/2 wave antenna with a 1/4 matching section (3/4 overall), Why the 1/4 matching section? Seems that takes it nearly to the full half wave length...or close enough not to matter much... Myself, I would probably prefer a "gamma loop" type matching scheme, which adds no height. To me, 16 ft tall is no more trouble than 12 ft tall in the real world. I've had a lightweight 32 ft self supporting radiator up, which was no hassle at all...And the base of that was at 36 ft on a mast. "68 ft tall total". That was a dual band 40m GP/ 17m 5/8 GP....Full size on both bands, relay switched. helical winding of this form into a 3/8 overall height (approx. 12 ft. @ 28Mhz) might be possible. The extremely low angle of radiation (approx. 8 degrees) would make this vertical antenna desirable... ...................... The angle of maximum radiation will vary fairly drastically depending on height above ground. For a "like" sized vertical, the height above ground will have more of an effect, than any extra electrical length. To my way of thinking, the advantage of the extended winding should be the largest, the closer to ground it is. The higher above ground, approaching 1/2 wave up, the lesser the advantage. Note that at high heights above ground in WL, the 1/4 wave ground plane, and the 1/2 wave vertical have nearly the same gain for practical purposes. "maybe .3 -.8 db difference..." You should consider decoupling of the antenna from the feedline also. Radiation from the line will skew the pattern upwards off the horizon. This will ruin even higher gain collinears. I like my antennas full size if at all possible. I'm a radio bully. :/ MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vintage 78 RPM Blues Collection For Sale / Robert Johnson; Elmore James; Blind Boy Fuller; Blind Lemon Jefferson; Bessie Smith; Muddy Waters | Swap | |||
Helical Resonators?? | Swap | |||
Helical Resonators | General | |||
Horizontal J type (G2BCX Slim Jim for those who remember) | Antenna | |||
Helical Stub Antenna | Antenna |