On 9/11/2010 9:21 PM, tom wrote:
On 9/11/2010 11:27 AM, K1TTT wrote:
On Sep 11, 4:18 pm, John wrote:
no, you must have me confused with someone else. i quote well
accepted engineering texts and journals. its art and mr.b that put
together rube goldberg theories to fit their latest whim.

Yeah, you are like richard clark, you base beliefs and claim facts
depending on who states them, and proudly so, it is not the context of
the statement, it is who said it, the above is an excellent example, in
your own words. A million men can be wrong, just as easily as one ...
especially using the your method, above ... an echo chamber is not a
place to seek truth.

You probably think 9/11 wasn't an inside job too
...:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...ineers-for-911...


There are your experts, engineers architects ...

Regards,
JS

ah, a conspiracy lover... i always ask the question: If the
government were involved in any given conspiracy how long do you think
they could really keep it secret?

I have always wondered which of the 2 groups debating here are more
successful. Like who gets paid for their stand on what's real.

To state it a bit more clearly - who can make a living based upon their
stand on what's real? That always separates the wheat from the chaff.

Mr B, Art, Doctor Smith, how'r you all doin' in the antenna consulting
and/or sales and design business?

I expect very well considering you know more than the rest of group that
hangs out here.

Please insert ill considered response 6 lines below.

tom
K0TAR