On 9/3/2010 9:12 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:

...
AFTERMATH.
The judge dismissed charges against the police officer after being
shown police rules that recipients of a tazer gun MUST be taken to
hospital prior to internment.

I first read that as 'interment', and thought, "How inconvenient!".


Well, I did jump to a conclusion, based on insufficient data.

This cops' heart might have been in the right place. He needs a caution
given to him and partnered with a more level headed officer. He may
actually have what the public wants/needs ...

It speaks horribly of Amerika though, we need a "kinder/gentler" way of
providing assistance to those unable to afford it ...

Regards,
JS

On Sep 3, 11:12*am, Ian Jackson
wrote:
In message
, Art
Unwin writes



On Sep 3, 10:07*am, Art Unwin wrote:
On TV news last night they showed a video of a police officer talking
to a man resting on a sofa in his own home. His wife had called
saying that he had a heart attack and should go to hospital. The man
refused to go
preferring to rest rather than go to hospital for treatment as he
could not afford it. The police officer then tazered him to make him
go to hospital! The chief of Police said that standard protocol had
been followed.
Only in America!!!!
I wonder if he is still married to the woman
or he cancelled his insurance policy?

AFTERMATH.
The judge dismissed charges against the police officer after being
shown police rules that recipients of a tazer gun MUST be taken to
hospital prior to internment.

I first read that as 'interment', and thought, "How inconvenient!".

The same judge dismissed divorce proceedings stating irreconcilable
differences had not been proven and the husband was to pay all court
costs.
The above part anticipates what is yet to happen.

--
Ian

AFTER AFTERMATH
The husband on hearing the judge speak fell to the ground gasping and
clutching his chest. He was taken to hospital with his wife by his
side and who stayed at his bedside where further enquires listed his
condition as ..."grave".

On 9/3/2010 9:29 AM, Art Unwin wrote:

...
AFTER AFTERMATH
The husband on hearing the judge speak fell to the ground gasping and
clutching his chest. He was taken to hospital with his wife by his
side and who stayed at his bedside where further enquires listed his
condition as ..."grave".

Did he have an antenna in his hand in the courtroom? Did anyone mistake
it for a weapon? Was it a loaded antenna?

Art, supply all the data so we can make proper statements!

Regards,
JS

On Sep 3, 11:34*am, John Smith wrote:
On 9/3/2010 9:29 AM, Art Unwin wrote:

...
AFTER AFTERMATH
The husband on hearing the judge speak fell to the ground gasping and
clutching his chest. He was taken to hospital with his wife by his
side and who stayed at his bedside where further enquires listed his
condition as ..."grave".

Did he have an antenna in his hand in the courtroom? *Did anyone mistake
it for a weapon? *Was it a loaded antenna?

Art, supply all the data so we can make proper statements!

Regards,
JS

Heh, this group is so full of negativety and poor judgement so I
thought that Katie Curic news story
yesterday should be jollied up a bit, so that instead of laughing at
others we should try being the recipient to see if our actions hurts
others.
Have a great week end.

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:07:28 -0700, Art Unwin rearranged some electrons to
say:

On TV news last night they showed a video of a police officer talking to
a man resting on a sofa in his own home. His wife had called saying that
he had a heart attack and should go to hospital. The man refused to go
preferring to rest rather than go to hospital for treatment as he could
not afford it. The police officer then tazered him to make him go to
hospital! The chief of Police said that standard protocol had been
followed.
Only in America!!!!
I wonder if he is still married to the woman or he cancelled his
insurance policy?

And what does this have to do with amateur radio?

On 9/3/2010 7:05 PM, david wrote:

...
And what does this have to do with amateur radio?

Next question, please?