Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12-Oct-10 11:38, Jon wrote:
I have a Realistic DX-160 0.15-30Mhz Solid State Communications Receiver for which I want to build or obtain an antenna. Is this DX-160 military grade? -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.35.7 ^ ^ 21:07:01 up 12 days 22:24 1 user load average: 1.04 1.03 1.00 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will probably receive lots of suggestions about your antenna. My
comments a 1. Longer is not better. Once an antenna becomes too long, it becomes more directional (in odd ways) and may have more tendenacy to overload the receiver. On the normal shortwave bands, receiver sensitivity is not the issue (assuming a reasonably practical receiver); the signal-to-noise ratio is the key element. A longer antenna can increase the signal but it usually also increases the noise to the same degree and this does not accomplish anything (except possibly overload the receiver). 2. A preselector can help prevent overload and may be a reasonable idea on a less expensive receiver. (But it is not necessary; try working without it.) 3. A vertical or horizontal antenna (or a combination) can work. A horizontal antenna may be less prone to "static" in your area. 4. Does the receiver have two antenna input terminals, with neither "grounded" to the chassis? If so, a dipole might be appropriate. More likely, it has a single terminal possibly with a second terminal optionally "grounded". In this case, a single wire to the antenna might be better. (The "feedline" to the antenna is part of the antenna also; try to keep it away from electrically noisy things.) 5. With a single wire antenna, try the receiver with and without a "ground" connection. It will probably be better with the "ground". You are unlikely to need a ground stake. Try connecting to the "third pin" (ground) of your electrical socket. Or, try two or three wires of different lengths (15 - 25 feet) laying on the ground (or under a carpet, etc). For receiving only, you can try many different things --- there is no "right" answer. 6. For listening on typical shortwave bands, an outside antenna wire perhaps 35-40 feet long should be sufficient. For what you describe, the compass orientation will not matter much. If possible, have the antenna up at least 30 feet and a little away from the house. 7. You did not ask about a feedline. For a single wire you could use coax. What might be better is twin line with the antenna end of one side of the feedline connected to nothing. The receiver end of this "nothing side" would be connected to the ground terminal of the receiver. All my suggestions will be shot down on various technical points, but they may be reasonable for getting started. Possibly the most important thing is to start understanding shortwave propagation. What times are best to listen for Europe on which shortwave bands? There are no definite rules here; the condition of the ionosphere varies from day to day and hour to hour. Bill W2WO |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
B&W End-Fed Vee HF Antenna questions. | Antenna | |||
SWL Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
PAR EFL-SWL Antenna, and Inverted-L Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
A few SW Antenna Questions | Shortwave | |||
Antenna Questions | Shortwave |