Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Horne wrote in
: .... other reasons for not doing it in a particular way. Other than the No BalUn voodoo are there other reasons that you don't like J-poles? It is not that I "don't like J-Poles", but that they have certain characteristics that should be considered in their design and implementation. They are an 'end fed' antenna, and there is necessarily some common mode current excited on the feed line / supporting mast structure. A balun helps to reduce that, and I described an integrated balun that is an elegant construction, though a further ferrite current mode choke would be of benefit. The plumber's delight construction which is often hailed as an advantage is actually a frustration when trying to reduce common mode current. Though the J-Pole is often promoted as a easy thing to implement, they figure disproportionately in online forums with questions like "I adjusted my SWR real good in the shop, and when I raise the thing, the SWR changes". The common sensitivity of measured SWR to antenna position and line placement is a sure sign of high common mode current. The common mode current doesn't necessarily stop them working, but it does frustrate setup, a trap for the inexperienced. BTW, J-Poles are not popular commercially in this country, I cannot recall ever seeing a commercial J-Pole for non-amateur use. Perhaps there is a message there about convenience and predictability for the installers. If a J-Pole suits your requirement, go for it. They warrant an effective common mode choke, if for no other reason than to make VSWR less dependent on the layout below the feed point. Owen |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
J-Pole Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
ladder line J-pole question | Antenna | |||
2 meter tv twin (300ohm) J pole question | Antenna |