Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
antenna physics question
On Dec 15, 11:13*pm, wrote:
K1TTT wrote: On Dec 15, 8:49*pm, wrote: Registered User wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:29:12 -0000, wrote: Registered User wrote: The IEEE Standard Definitions Terms for Antennas (IEEE Std 145-1993) provides no definition for 'antenna efficiency' per se. So what? snip babble The post concerning "a unique and unambigous definition" which "can be found in any textbook on electromagnetics" and subsequent back-pedaling appears to fit that model. Your "So what?" provides the meh. Yeah, the "back-pedaling" which consisted of changing "any textbook" to "many textbooks". And nowhere did I reference any standard, IEEE, ISO, or any other standards body. well, maybe you should have... after all, some of us do use things written by those bodies. *some of us help write and test those standards. *and it sure would be nice if we could refer to a standard way of describing antenna performance. If I were you I would be more concerned why so many of you posts appear twice. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. i think i have figured that out... if i post to the group it takes me right back to reading messages... and then if i do a refresh it must try to do the same post it just did since that is how it got to the current page. i'll try to remember to go back to the message list first which seems to avoid that problem. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Physics forums censor ship | Antenna | |||
sci.physics.electromag NEEDS YOU! | Antenna | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |