Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 10, 4:49*pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:55:15 -0800 (PST), K1TTT wrote: it is actually more correct to call them chokes than baluns since they really just try to choke off the current on the shield of the coax at the feed point. Some balance needs to be returned to this (pun intended). *The expression BalUn is first and foremost found in what this word means in full: Balance/Unbalanced and THAT is the principle transformation. Turns ratio may come, but that is variable (2:1, 4:1, 6:1...) to a design that must first meet the requirement of isolating one side that is balanced from the other side that is unbalanced. This is achieved in choking common mode currents - hence the BalUn must effectively present choking action to meet this principle transformation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC here comes the troll statement... currents are always balanced and there is no transformation. the currents in a coax are already balanced, on the inside. the action of the choke is to prevent current from flowing on the outside of the shield back to the inside at the antenna feed point. this forces the return path to be the other half of the antenna if all works properly. let the balun wars commence! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|