Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Jim" == k7jeb remove this K7JEB writes: Jim ASCII art fails me, Jack. You can model the coax as a wire to Jim ground, but that wire has to have all the geometric twists and Jim turns that your actual coax takes getting to the transmitter. That'll be a royal pain in the butt, to put it kindly. Jim The coax shield is part of your antenna system; it radiates along Jim with both sides of the dipole. And even at your transmitter, Jim "ground" isn't really ground. There is a connecting wire between Jim the transmitter case and "earth" ground. Actually, at my station. the water-pipe ground is connected to the antenna tuner's ground which is connected to the transceiver's ground, but I get your point. Jim In reality, there is no such thing as "ground" with RF. This appears to be one of those subtleties that has slipped past me. Jim The reason your post caught my eye is that I have the same Jim antenna system you do - coax-fed dipole with no balun - and had Jim to model my coax line shield to get "real" EZNEC results. Interesting. I do actually have two current-mode baluns -- the feedpoint has eight or nine turns of coax that were wrapped around a coffee can before being tied down and the coffee can removed, and the transceiver has three turns of coax through three large rare earth magnets. How does one model those with NEC2? Jim Jim, K7JEB Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAduv5GPFSfAB/ezgRApx/AKDw+/x5Ku3RSZxFHKWvh7N6md64MQCgvZZu S5/ViSXlynci7QGrWcjIcMA= =rFjA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I wrote: ASCII art fails me, Jack. You can model the coax as a wire to ground, but that wire has to have all the geometric twists and turns that your actual coax takes getting to the transmitter. Jack Twilley: That'll be a royal pain in the butt, to put it kindly. That's *real* antenna analysis. Think about doing that for all the wires in a missile silo to assess EMP vulnerability and you get an idea about how the big boys use NEC. Actually, you can fudge it a bit. Any bump or kink less that 1/10 wavelength in extent can be approximated with a chord between its endpoints. In reality, there is no such thing as "ground" with RF. This appears to be one of those subtleties that has slipped past me. Yeah, the best one can do is equipotential surfaces, with the hope that one of those surfaces is parallel to that big hunk of lossy dielectric beneath your feet. Interesting. I do actually have two current-mode baluns -- the feedpoint has eight or nine turns of coax that were wrapped around a coffee can before being tied down and the coffee can removed, and the transceiver has three turns of coax through three large rare earth magnets. How does one model those with NEC2? As fixed inductances in series with the "coax shield" wire. I make your first balun to be about 10 uH, which is roughly 200 ohms at 3 MHz. Your guess is as good as mine on the one with the rare-earth magnets. What you want to look for is reducing the current in the "coax shield" wire to zero. 73, Jim, K7JEB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:31:16 -0700, Jack Twilley
wrote: the transceiver has three turns of coax through three large rare earth magnets. How does one model those with NEC2? Hi Jack, Magnets do not play any particular role in chokes. Magnetic cores perhaps, but being magnetic is not in and of itself a remarkable indicator of efficient choking potential. Research the archives for ferrites, amidon, type 43 or 75 or 77 (there are others), beads, and so on as terms. As for modeling them, they are resistors. You can rate them at about a Watt to 5 Watts (I've never tested one to destruction). Again, you need the characteristics to know how much. The typical bead exhibits about 20 Ohms in the mid to high HF region. The shape of its curve (the resistance vs. frequency) is variable for any particular type. Some increase through HF, others decrease, some don't even begin until VHF. Beads are additive. Two beads, 40 Ohms, three beads, 60 Ohms and so on. Passes through a larger core (same material) sees a square law effect X1, X4, X9 and so on. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EZNEX Modeling Question | Antenna | |||
Announcement: New Nec2 modeling available - Nec2Go | Antenna | |||
antenna modeling question | Antenna | |||
antenna modeling question | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |