Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I have started modeling my dipole antenna with NEC2, but I've got a question that doesn't seem to be adequately covered by the documentation or the examples. I have a fan dipole with various lengths of wire. The long legs are significantly bent, and I have modeled them as two wires with coterminous ends -- this seems to be correct. The shorter legs are just legs. In the real antenna, the feedpoint is connected to a length of coax such that the center of the coax is electrically connected to the western half of the antenna and the shield of the coax is electrically connected to the eastern half. I can see how to set the voltage source to the western half of the antenna, but I do not see how to set the ground to the eastern half of the antenna without adding a ground wire. Does this really matter? Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAdRCGGPFSfAB/ezgRAu9+AJ9jzECHVpazeEv0TqtwVI2Aa0TjHwCfVs+B Q2EOJ+5okZKJDCxyFxWbzQ0= =zzCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Twilley wrote:
I can see how to set the voltage source to the western half of the antenna, but I do not see how to set the ground to the eastern half of the antenna without adding a ground wire. Does this really matter? Connect the two sides of the antenna together with a wire and install a source in the middle of that wire. Forget the coax for now. You can expand on the model later. Something like this: ---------------------+--S--+----------------------- | | -----------+ +------------ -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I tried what you suggested, and the results on first glance look better, but I get geometry warnings. Apparently the jumper between the two sides of the antenna is too short, or something. Thanks for the tip! I'll keep fussing with it. Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAdZGKGPFSfAB/ezgRAm1vAKCUlnhqvGFSw/PBSBHlzc5RCwRuogCgj5b6 cq/sdePTSg0m3JsV/4BocrM= =hJr9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack originally wrote:
In the real antenna, the feedpoint is connected to a length of coax such that the center of the coax is electrically connected to the western half of the antenna and the shield of the coax is electrically connected to the eastern half. Cecil wrote to you: Connect the two sides of the antenna together with a wire and install a source in the middle of that wire. Forget the coax for now. You can expand on the model later. Something like this: ---------------------+--S--+----------------------- | | -----------+ +------------ I would just add that the coax can be modeled as shown below: ---------------------+--S--+----------------------- | | -----------+ +------------ | (shield) | | | | | | | | | | | -------- ----- --- Jim, K7JEB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Sure, I could drop a line down to ground, but the antenna itself doesn't work that way. It goes down a long coaxial line to the transmitter, at which point the shield is grounded and the center conductor is connected to the signal. Does that matter? This stuff is black magic, I tell you. Jack. - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAdncbGPFSfAB/ezgRAsvRAJ47d+IGSWD3O8uENBy+pmYyJh9uwwCeNnCG uAXzpVjz6lu8q79wpA84QuU= =80qL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Twilley:
Sure, I could drop a line down to ground, but the antenna itself doesn't work that way. It goes down a long coaxial line to the transmitter, at which point the shield is grounded and the center conductor is connected to the signal. Does that matter? ASCII art fails me, Jack. You can model the coax as a wire to ground, but that wire has to have all the geometric twists and turns that your actual coax takes getting to the transmitter. The coax shield is part of your antenna system; it radiates along with both sides of the dipole. And even at your transmitter, "ground" isn't really ground. There is a connecting wire between the transmitter case and "earth" ground. In reality, there is no such thing as "ground" with RF. The reason your post caught my eye is that I have the same antenna system you do - coax-fed dipole with no balun - and had to model my coax line shield to get "real" EZNEC results. Jim, K7JEB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EZNEX Modeling Question | Antenna | |||
Announcement: New Nec2 modeling available - Nec2Go | Antenna | |||
antenna modeling question | Antenna | |||
antenna modeling question | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |