Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In "T. & D. Gregor, Sr."
wrote: Hi Bert: I don't have any empirical evidence one way or the other. However, knowing a bit about manufacturing... I think that I can reliably say that any antenna design prior to the acquisition would in all likelihood be unchanged from the original design parameters. I agree that they're unlikely to have changed the design on any of the existing products. I'm wondering about the quality of the manufactured parts. Are all the holes in the right place, are the tubes of the correct length, are all the soldered connections actually soldered, etc? More generally, will the things go together and stay together? The other side of that thinking... a new design, post acquisition would be an unknown. Just my two cents... Merry Christmas Tom G, Sr. On 20 Dec 2010 14:29:17 GMT, Bert Hyman wrote: Can anybody comment on the build quality of their antennas since MFJ took them over? -- Bert Hyman W0RSB St. Paul, MN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hygain rotor quality decline? | Antenna | |||
Hygain rotor quality decline? | Equipment | |||
To build or not to build Part II | Homebrew | |||
To build or not to build | Homebrew | |||
Build em | Shortwave |