wrote ...
K1TTT wrote:

but did distance affect the sidebands???? that is the question,
please keep mr. B on topic!

This babbling moron has been posting his nonsense for years on the physics
and physics.electromagnetic groups.

When I first read his posts years ago I thought his gibberish was because
English wasn't his native language but soon came to realize that the issue
isn't language, the issue is brain chemistry.

Recently he has moved to the amateur groups, I guess in hopes that the
people here won't be as "harsh" as they are in the science groups.

You can give him facts and links all day long, but since he doesn't seem
to have more than two synapses that fire properly, he will never
understand
any response and just continue to babble on.

So there are a few choices to answering his posts:

Don't

Remind him he is a drooling mental case

Respond with some facts that may be of interest to others when he
accidently
hits on something, such as the history of broadcasting, then remind him he
is a drooling mental case.

Do not be angry that you do not know if " did distance affect the
sidebands???? ". It is nothing wrong.
The effect is obvious in light of physics laws. Such obvious that fathers of
the radio did not write about this.
Young people can measure it if it is interesting for them.
S*

On Dec 25, 10:06*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
...



K1TTT wrote:

but did distance affect the sidebands???? *that is the question,
please keep mr. B on topic!

This babbling moron has been posting his nonsense for years on the physics
and physics.electromagnetic groups.

When I first read his posts years ago I thought his gibberish was because
English wasn't his native language but soon came to realize that the issue
isn't language, the issue is brain chemistry.

Recently he has moved to the amateur groups, I guess in hopes that the
people here won't be as "harsh" as they are in the science groups.

You can give him facts and links all day long, but since he doesn't seem
to have more than two synapses that fire properly, he will never
understand
any response and just continue to babble on.

So there are a few choices to answering his posts:

Don't

Remind him he is a drooling mental case

Respond with some facts that may be of interest to others when he
accidently
hits on something, such as the history of broadcasting, then remind him he
is a drooling mental case.

Do not be angry that you do not know if " did distance affect the
sidebands???? ". It is nothing wrong.
The effect is obvious in light of physics laws. Such obvious that fathers of
the radio did not write about this.
Young people can measure it if it is interesting for them.
S*

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

On Dec 25, 2:57*pm, joe wrote:
K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

that's just another name for it... i threw in the big words because
i'm sure that mr.b will look them up out of context and find all sorts
of hilarious ways to recombine them.

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Dec 25, 2:57 pm, joe wrote:
K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

that's just another name for it... i threw in the big words because
i'm sure that mr.b will look them up out of context and find all sorts
of hilarious ways to recombine them.

http://dj4br.home.t-link.de/ssb3e.htm
I am sure that the all my questions will be explained with the ionosphere.
The first my question was on the frequency doubling.
But yours selective fading means for me "distance itself does affect
sidebands". So you are very helpfull.

For me all names are clear.
Ampere discovered the electrons and give them name "current elements".
Maxwell used "electric particless". But you all admire Heaviside's fluid
(massles and incompressible). Do you see the difference?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Dec 25, 2:57 pm, joe wrote:
K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

that's just another name for it... i threw in the big words because
i'm sure that mr.b will look them up out of context and find all sorts
of hilarious ways to recombine them.

http://dj4br.home.t-link.de/ssb3e.htm
I am sure that the all my questions will be explained with the
ionosphere. The first my question was on the frequency doubling.
But yours selective fading means for me "distance itself does affect
sidebands". So you are very helpfull.


But you fail to recognize that distance ALONE does NOT affect sidebands
differently. It requires something else to be present.



For me all names are clear.
Ampere discovered the electrons and give them name "current elements".
Maxwell used "electric particless". But you all admire Heaviside's fluid
(massles and incompressible). Do you see the difference?
S*

Uzytkownik "joe" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Dec 25, 2:57 pm, joe wrote:
K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

that's just another name for it... i threw in the big words because
i'm sure that mr.b will look them up out of context and find all sorts
of hilarious ways to recombine them.

http://dj4br.home.t-link.de/ssb3e.htm
I am sure that the all my questions will be explained with the
ionosphere. The first my question was on the frequency doubling.
But yours selective fading means for me "distance itself does affect
sidebands". So you are very helpfull.


But you fail to recognize that distance ALONE does NOT affect sidebands
differently. It requires something else to be present.

Jim wrote: "At some frequencies the ionosphere is transparent, at some it is
reflective,
at some it is absorptive."

Some of you play with the Moon. Are the sidebands the distance dependent?
The distance is huge and the ionosphere is transparent.
S*

For me all names are clear.
Ampere discovered the electrons and give them name "current elements".
Maxwell used "electric particless". But you all admire Heaviside's fluid
(massles and incompressible). Do you see the difference?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Dec 25, 2:57 pm, joe wrote:
K1TTT wrote:

distance itself does not affect sidebands.

frequency dependent dispersion in the ionosphere can affect sidebands
and the mark/space tones of rtty differently over short periods
causing differential fading and distortion.

One could also consider selective fading.

that's just another name for it... i threw in the big words because
i'm sure that mr.b will look them up out of context and find all sorts
of hilarious ways to recombine them.

http://dj4br.home.t-link.de/ssb3e.htm
I am sure that the all my questions will be explained with the ionosphere.

Hardly.

At some frequencies the ionosphere is transparent, at some it is reflective,
at some it is absorptive.

And the iononsphere has little to nothing to do with ground wave propagation,
which predominates at AM broadcast frequencies.

But you haven't a clue what any of that means, do you?

The first my question was on the frequency doubling.
But yours selective fading means for me "distance itself does affect
sidebands". So you are very helpfull.

Correct conclusion but for totally wrong reasons, much like noticing ice
cream is cold therefor the sky is blue.

For me all names are clear.

Babble.

Ampere discovered the electrons and give them name "current elements".

You are wrong as usual.

Richard Laming came up with the concept, the name was by George Johnstone
Stoney, the particle itself was identified by Sir John Joseph Thomson.

Maxwell used "electric particless". But you all admire Heaviside's fluid
(massles and incompressible). Do you see the difference?
S*

More mindless, word salad babble.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Do not be angry that you do not know if " did distance affect the
sidebands???? ". It is nothing wrong.

It is gibberish; one has nothing to do with the other.

The effect is obvious in light of physics laws. Such obvious that fathers of
the radio did not write about this.
Young people can measure it if it is interesting for them.
S*

More meaningless gibberish.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.