Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Antonio - I think you slipped a decimal point. The parallel equivalent of the
series combo 58R-2947j is actually 149k+2948j. Hi John, I do not understand where your -2947j figure comes from. I see it appearing nowhere in my calculations. The antenna mentioned by Mikek has an impedance of 58R-1,072j which, according to my spreadsheet, corresponds (at 1 MHz) to the parallel of 19862R and -1075j (that is a 148,1 pF capacitor). In any case, parallel -- series trasformations never result in a change of the reactance sign; therefore it is not possible that a -2957j (negative) reactance is transformed into a +2948j (positive) reactance. 73 Tony I0JX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parallel Lines? | Antenna | |||
OT Parallel to USB Cable | CB | |||
Parallel Lines | Antenna | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew |