Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
amdx wrote:
"Robert Baer" wrote in message net... amdx wrote: Hi All, Please look at this in fixed font. I'm looking for understanding of a series to parallel conversion for antenna matching. I'm pretty sure I'm missing something, so point it out to me. This is in regard to a crystal radio, so the match is for a low impedance antenna to a high impedance tank circuit. The antenna: R=58 ohms C=1072 ohms at 1Mhz. The tank: L=240uh C=106pf Q = 1000 Tank Z =~1.5 Mohms Here's my understanding of what I think I'm reading. I put a matching capacitor in series with the antenna. Antenna-- -----R-----C--------Match cap-----tank------ground. and this is supposed to transform the circuit to this. ( Maybe better said, equivalent to this) l------------l l l Antenna--- R C LC---Tank l l l------------l ^ Ground I calculate an 18.5pf cap for the match, making the antenna look like 58R and 17pf. So this; Antenna-- -----58R-----270pf--------Match cap18.5pf-----1.5Mohms------ground. This converts to; l-----------------l l l Antenna---58R 17pf 1.5M---LC Tank at l l Resonance l-----------------l ^ Ground And I now have a 1.5 Mohms source feeding a 1.5 Mohm load. The purpose of which is to cause minimal loading of the tank by the antenna. I don't understand how adding a series capacitor makes a parallel conversion. What do I misunderstand or do just need to believe the numbers. Thanks, Mikek Well, that is nominally considered as "matching" in that the coupling from the antenna is minimal so as to not load the parallel resonant circuit; a tradeoff actually between energy transfer and loading. A better way might be to have a low Z tap on the inductor; a method used in radios since the 60's i think. Yes that can be done, but my inductor will be 660/46 litz wire. I'm sure it's possible to make a tap, but with the cost of litz I don't want to. Mikek So what is wrong with winding a "second" layer with only a few truns (say 1/20 of larger coil) and connecting it series aiding, use whole "tapped" (now) coil for the LC resonance and the use that (new) tap? Besides, if it is not would, the amount of the wire would be no different wether you put a tap in or not. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parallel Lines? | Antenna | |||
OT Parallel to USB Cable | CB | |||
Parallel Lines | Antenna | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew | |||
varicaps in parallel | Homebrew |