Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all
I have it back up without the balun, and still have to use the coax for now. I am able to tune it now on all bands but I am sure there is a lot of power loss from the tuner. I grounded out all devices in the shack but still receiving a lot of RF interferrence on tv, computer, and home alarm. Thanks for all the advice, really appreciate it. "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , "Bob" writes: We have put together a dipole, each leg is 66 feet. We put a 1:1 balun and it is running about 60 feet of 50 ohm coax. Presently it is about half way up the tower it is intended for so we could check the SWR before getting it up to the highest point. Presently each leg has some lags and dips, no major bends but it is just hanging there, over some bushes and the entire thing is over top of the house, and not touching anything but is very close to some steel guy wires (uninsulated). What you have is the classic dipole for 80 meters. Now we can only tune this down to a useable SWR on the 80m band. On all other bands we cannot tune it down to a safe operating range. We are using a good antenna tuner but cannot get anything useable except for 80m. Here we are able to tune the SWR right down. That is normal behavior. Questions??? Would we be better without that balun? No. Is the fact that the dipole is still too low and close to the guy wires ( but not touching) our problem? No. Any suggestions please?? The problem is this: The antenna you describe is approximately: one half-wavelength long on 80 meters two half-wavelengths long on 40 meters four half-wavelengths long on 20 meters six half-wavelengths long on 15 meters etc. Such a center-fed dipole antenna has a feed point impedance that is fairly "low" (that is, under about 100 ohms) on frequencies where it is an *odd* number of half-wavelengths. On frequencies where it is an *even* number of half wavelengths, the feed point impedance is very high - greater than 1000 ohms. The 1:1 balun and 50 ohm coax you are using are low-impedance devices, so they work fine on 80 meters. But on the other bands, they do not work with the high impedance of the antenna. A tuner at the shack end of the coax cannot make up for the enormous mismatch at the antenna end. Even if it could, the loss in the coax from being operated at such a high SWR would make such a system very inefficient. There are several possible solutions: 1) Use a different transmission line (high impedance balanced line) and eliminate the balun. This requires a balanced antenna tuner and the mechanical difficulties of using non-coax transmission lines 2) Use a different sort of dipole that is an odd number of half-wavelengths on the desired bands. One form of this dipole is the "trap dipole", in which tuned circuits (traps) electrically alter the effective antenna length. A really good information source is W4RNL's (Cebik) website. Goole on his name or call to find it. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
10m dipole and tuner | Antenna |