Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:54:53 -0800, Jim Lux wrote: Here we have three (3) antennas, and as we all know they are not in isolation. Somewhere, there's a nearby (or near enough) overlooked reflective surface that disrupts that oh-so-absolutely-necessary symmetry. All practical systems like this use some form of adaptive logic to fix that. Usually, adaptive canceling is done in the receiver, because the signal levels are lower, but in the 802.11 kind of world, with 100mW linear transmitters, there's probably not much cost difference. A different matter if you're running a kilowatt. It only takes a couple of milliWatts (kiloWatts aside) to ruin your day in competition for listening to microWatt signals. The desired signal's transmitter antenna would have to be literally within the near field of the active transmitter (and receiver's) antenna system. At that point, we may as well use a land-line with hybrid bridges. Software coming to the rescue for a hardware problem works only in multi-million dollar projects (fly-by-wire avionics comes to mind). In these sorts of systems (the ones alluded to in the original news story), all the signals are in one FPGA (in digital form) and the powers are fairly low so all the RF stuff runs basically linear (DC to RF efficiency isn't a huge deal on a 50mW transmitter next to a 10 Watt FPGA) So it *is* a wireline hybrid bridge.. but done with numbers instead of transformer windings. The point I was getting at is that in these MIMO systems, there's already multiple receive and transmit channels with substantial signal processing going on. So it doesn't really matter much whether you do the cancellation/null forming in the Tx or Rx side. If you can do some clever canceling with Tx, and make it possible to use a cheaper Rx (or, run full duplex without needing huge dynamic range/linearity in the Rx) then that's probably a net good. The technique proposed is very, very similar to one used to create increased stereo separation ("headphone sound") from conventional stereo speakers. You send a part of the Left channel signal to the right speaker that just cancels the signal arriving at the right ear from the left speaker. It's a very, very impressive effect. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) No Comment | Shortwave | |||
DRM in the USA: a comment | Broadcasting | |||
eBay comment | Swap | |||
Pls comment on this dipole | Antenna | |||
Comment By Optoelectronics | Scanner |