| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:06:39 -0800, Jim Lux wrote: No.. the original article was talking about low power 802.11/802.16 systems (which radiate less than a watt).. At that power level, the fact that a suitably good linear amplifier is going to consume a fair amount of power (20% efficiency would be doing well) is insignificant next to the power consumed by the digital processing necessary to implement the cancellation algorithm. As I said, how that finds its way into antenna system consideration still remains a mystery. because the referenced patent is talking about a *system* not just an antenna. So the *system* implementation is relevant.. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ( OT ) No Comment | Shortwave | |||
| DRM in the USA: a comment | Broadcasting | |||
| eBay comment | Swap | |||
| Pls comment on this dipole | Antenna | |||
| Comment By Optoelectronics | Scanner | |||