| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello John,
On 2 mar, 18:14, "J.B. Wood" wrote: On 3/2/2011 8:40 AM, Wimpie wrote: On 2 mar, 13:58, "J.B. *wrote: On 02/23/2011 10:00 AM, RadioWaves wrote: *Today I have put my homepage online with information about the Magnetic Loop Antenna. http://www.qsl.net/pa7nr/ PA7NR Hmmm. *A "magnetic" loop antenna. *Must be some other types of loop antennas as well. *Maybe there are also "electric" loop antennas. Guess they left something out of all those antenna textbooks I have ;-) Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO, -- J. B. Wood * * * * * * * * *e-mail: Hello John, When you cut the loop at two opposite positions, yes, you can make your "electric" loop. It will generate lots of E-field, you may need another coil for matching, and it is probably less efficient then a short straight dipole with massive capacitive disks to get larger I*delta(le) product. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl In case of PM, please remove abc first. Hello, and the not-so-subtle point is that there aren't magnetic, electric, or any other such "types" of loop antennas. *There are just loop antennas that can further be described as shielded/unshielded, balanced/unbalanced, electrically small or large. *Just like we don't transmit (propagate) electric (E) or magnetic (H) fields by themselves. The purpose of an antenna is to radiate and/or intercept an electromagnetic field. *By definition energy radiated by a transmitting antenna is not temporarily stored in the antenna's local electric or magnetic field. *It's been released into free space subject to interception by a receiving antenna(s) or any other parasitic structures. *The receiving antenna transfers part the intercepted energy to the load (receiver and other dissipative losses) and scatters the rest back into free space. By contrast, a transformer, for example, is a "magnetic" device that is intended to transfer energy by a localized means (induction) other than the propagation/interception of electromagnetic radiation. If in your opinion there do not exist antennas that generate a dominant magnetic or electric field (in the near field), then you are contradicting yourself, as you can't transfer energy with a magnetic field or electric field only. So your transformer also involves electric fields. Maybe you should look into the Poynting theorem. To further confuse the issue, a conductor in the near (reactive) field of a transmitting antenna will have current induced in it by the antenna's local electric and/or magnetic fields. *However, that's not the usual purpose for which we design antennas. *An exception might be the immoboliser (PATS) system used in late-model motor vehicles that incorporates a ring antenna embedded in the steering column that is closely coupled at RF frequencies to the transponder chip and loop antenna embedded in the vehicle ignition key. *So is it a transmit-receive antenna configuration or a primary coil-secondary coil transformer configuration? *Given the proximity of the inserted key to the steering column I would guess the latter. *Sincerely, -- J. B. Wood * * * * * * * * *e-mail: When a noise source is about 5..10m away from an 3.6 MHz antenna, the coupling of that noise source towards a "magnetic" loop antenna may be different from the coupling towards an "electric" antenna, though both antennas may produce the same far field radiation. This is not from a textbook, but from experience (I am also working in power electronics). I fully agree with you on the far field statements, but when you live in an apartment (where significant spurious emission from home equipment are in the near field of your 3.6 MHz antenna), a so-called magnetic loop antenna may behave different (w.r.t. a short "electric" dipole). It can be worse or better. Many radio amateurs know this from experiments, without knowing the EM theory behind it. I have no problems when people talk about a "magnetic loop antenna". It shows me that they are discussing an antenna with a circumference 0.2 lambda. When people talk about a "loop antenna", it can be anything. Best regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| SBS-1 - information. Does anyone have any experience with ? | Scanner | |||
| Material of wi does it affect a loop antenna's performance? | Antenna | |||
| Magnetic Loop !!! | Antenna | |||
| Dipole vs. Delta loop vs. Quad loop -pratical experience | Antenna | |||