Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 9:09*pm, walt wrote:
Sorry Cecil, I can't correlate a two-port configuration using S parameters with the problem I have. In a one-port analysis, virtual impedances cause reflections. In a two- port analysis, only physical impedance discontinuities cause reflections. As I see it, that is the entire problem in a nutshell. You are using a one-port analysis for virtually :-) all of your analyses, including your source analysis. Your detractors are trying to talk you into using a two-port analysis. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |