Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 5:53*am, dave wrote:
try it! *you will read the exact same voltage on either side of that connection point! I already told you that only applies to the total voltage and total current. You will NOT read the same forward voltage on either side, you will NOT read the same forward current on either side, you will NOT read the same reflected voltage on either side, and you will NOT read the same reflected current on either side. The total voltage and total current are the results of the superposition of the four component voltages and currents that obey the rules of wave reflection mechanics. Recognizing the interference patterns when two phasor voltages are superposed is the key to understanding exactly what is happening to the energy in the waves. At an impedance discontinuity in a transmission line some distance from any active source, the average destructive interference power in one direction MUST equal the average constructive interference power in the opposite direction in order to avoid a violation of the conservation of energy principle. So why isn't the forward current flowing into the impedance discontinuity equal to the forward current flowing out of the impedance discontinuity? The answer to that question will solve Walt's apparent contradiction between voltages and powers. Look at the Z0- match again. source--50 ohm--+--1/2WL Z050 ohm--50 ohm load The total current on the 50 ohm side of point '+' is equal to the total current on the Z050 ohm side but the current on the 50 ohm side is a flat traveling wave *constant* current while the current on the Z050 ohm side is a standing-wave current maximum, i.e. the total current on the Z050 ohm side is a *variable* that changes with a change in the measurement point. A variable current is NOT the same as a constant current. The total voltage on the 50 ohm side is a flat traveling wave *constant* voltage while the voltage on the Z050 ohm side is a standing wave voltage minimum, i.e. the total voltage on the Z050 ohm side is a *variable* that changes with a change in the measurement point. The power on the 50 ohm side is V*I where V and I are constant values. The power on the Z050 ohm side is V*I*cos(A) where A is the angle between the current phasor and the voltage phasor and, because of the standing waves, all three parameters vary with location on the feedline. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 1:18*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:53*am, dave wrote: try it! *you will read the exact same voltage on either side of that connection point! I already told you that only applies to the total voltage and total current. You will NOT read the same forward voltage on either side, you will NOT read the same forward current on either side, you will NOT read the same reflected voltage on either side, and you will NOT read the same reflected current on either side. when someone gives me a voltmeter i can touch to that connection point and measure the 4 components then we can talk. as far as designing anything i need i can do it without giving those s parameters or your 4 components a second thought. it is very easy to transform and combine the impedances to tell me what the load seen by the transmitter is, or to figure out the needed stub for providing a proper match without all that stuff. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 6:43*am, dave wrote:
when someone gives me a voltmeter i can touch to that connection point and measure the 4 components then we can talk. I could design an expensive device that will do exactly that but it is a lot easier to just calculate the values using Mathcad. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |