LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Report Post  
Old June 25th 11, 06:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Default Reflection coefficient for total re-reflection

On Jun 25, 12:02*pm, John S wrote:
If the reflections toward the source is eliminated, how is it that it
appears to be 50 ohms at that point rather than 291.4 ohms?


You answered your own question - if reflections toward the source are
eliminated in a Z0=50 ohm environment, the apparent (virtual)
impedance cannot be anything except 50 ohms. When you look at yourself
in the mirror, your reflected apparent (virtual) distance behind the
mirror is the same as your actual distance from the mirror. The
reflection is NOT where it appears to be, i.e. it is virtual.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR Roger Sparks Antenna 72 February 9th 08 06:49 AM
Convert reflection coefficient to Z Wayne Antenna 30 April 7th 07 04:01 AM
Reflection Coefficient Reg Edwards Antenna 1 June 19th 05 06:50 PM
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. Richard Harrison Antenna 0 September 18th 03 09:26 AM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017