Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/25/2011 12:41 PM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Jun 25, 12:02 pm, John wrote: If the reflections toward the source is eliminated, how is it that it appears to be 50 ohms at that point rather than 291.4 ohms? You answered your own question - if reflections toward the source are eliminated in a Z0=50 ohm environment, the apparent (virtual) impedance cannot be anything except 50 ohms You said "Since a virtual impedance is result of the superposition of a forward wave and a reflected wave, a virtual impedance cannot re-reflect the reflected wave, i.e. one cannot re-reflect the reflected wave while at the same time the reflected wave is being used to generate an impedance." But, it does. First, it causes the 50 ohms line (looking into the 291.4 ohms line to see a match due to the reflection. Second, the re-reflection from that discontinuity is half of what maintains the circulating energy on the line. The other half is the discontinuity of the non-virtual load. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |