Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 1:52*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
If the reflected wave is re-reflected, it must be by an impedance other than the virtual impedance generated by the reflected wave itself. If the reflected wave is being used to generate a virtual impedance, it cannot at the same time be being re-reflected. I think i have finally seen the confusion point. you can not at the same time talk about reflected waves and re-reflected waves and also use s parameters or other steady state reflection parameters or impedances... this means you can not talk about individual reflections from the stub connection point without also analyzing the traveling wave inside the stub, nor can you track and sum up all the reflections using the steady state impedance of the stub as if it were a lumped value. to do so violates the conditions where the s parameters and reflection coefficients are valid, the sinusoidal steady state realm. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |