Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 25, 5:25*pm, John S wrote:
But, it does. First, it causes the 50 ohms line (looking into the 291.4 ohms line to see a match due to the reflection. Second, the re-reflection from that discontinuity is half of what maintains the circulating energy on the line. The other half is the discontinuity of the non-virtual load. John, EM wave reflection is what happens to a single wave. EM wave superposition/interference is what happens between two (or more) waves. They are not the same phenomenon and do NOT obey the same rules of physics. Wave cancellation between two waves is *NOT a reflection* but it does *redistribute* reflected energy back toward the load at the Z0-match point. The destructive interference energy toward the source is redistributed as constructive interference energy toward the load but one can tell from the resulting phase and magnitude that it was NOT a reflection. A good reference on the differences between wave reflection and wave superposition/interference is "Optics", by Eugene Hecht. The international 4th edition is available in paperback for around $20 from Abebooks.com. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |