Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 5:41*pm, K1TTT wrote:
I think i have finally seen the confusion point. you can not at the same time talk about reflected waves and re-reflected waves and also use s parameters or other steady state reflection parameters or impedances... Someone said it a long time ago: You can't have your cake and eat it too. One cannot be using the reflected wave to establish a dynamic virtual short while, at the same time, the virtual short is causing a dynamic re-reflection of the reflected wave. The virtual impedance is (Vfor+Vref)/(Ifor+Iref) but if that is the impedance doing the re-reflection of that same Vref and Iref, then it cannot also be being used to establish the dynamic virtual impedance, i.e. if a virtual impedance is re-reflecting all of the reflected energy, it will necessarily disappear from existence because there is no longer a Vref and Iref to cause it to exist. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |