LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 3rd 11, 03:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 74
Default Dipole question

On Jul 2, 5:38*pm, tom wrote:
On 7/1/2011 10:09 PM, Sal M. Onella wrote:

For all practical purposes, your change is close to an omni. *One
issue: *It has a fairly high take-off angle at 48 degrees. *Some
people do not worry about take-off angle, the elevation angle of
maximum radiation. *This is because the differences are only a few
dB. *It takes 6 dB to make a one s-unit change, so you're not totally
ruining your chances for a QSO if you're down a few.


"Sal"
stretching my limits


Sal

I can't resist.

Ever been in a pileup?

tom
K0TAR


Why, yes. I usually get crushed. I have occasionally been lucky.

Do tell why you ask. Dare I guess it has something to do with an
ignorant comment or two I've (probably) made about antennas and/or
takeoff angle? ;-)

I did mean "down a few dB," by the way, not "down a few s-units."

http://www.eham.net/articles/23758 is interesting.

"Sal"
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
40/15M dipole question [email protected] Antenna 6 April 8th 11 02:43 AM
40/15M dipole question [email protected] Antenna 15 April 7th 11 07:50 PM
40/15M dipole question [email protected] Antenna 0 April 6th 11 09:13 PM
dipole question [email protected] Antenna 4 July 6th 05 04:31 PM
Dipole question Vinnie S. CB 85 January 18th 05 04:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017