Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote On Thu, 13 May 2004 10:58:27 +0200, "Marc Battyani" wrote: This is what I have. The amplifier is directly connected to the loop. Here is a scope screen copy of the output of the amplifier: http://www.fractalconcept.com/scope-screen.jpg The C2 trace is the drain voltage and the C3 one is the 50 Ohm resistor voltage. The schematics is very simple: http://www.fractalconcept.com/schema.pdf The first one is the one that works on the scope screen. The second one is a one that does not work at all: the torus of the 680nH melted ![]() I have a little more success by just connecting the drain to the loop through a capacitor but it's still not good (25% efficiency) Any idea ? Hi Marc, There are a number of questions. First, how do you compute efficiency? The power in the load divided by the power used by the amplifier. Where on the schematic are these scope connections? ?? The C2 trace is the transistor drain voltage and the C3 one is the 50 Ohm resistor voltage (not the ground ;-). What is your design source for this schematic, or if original, what drove you to select the reactive components you did? The series load on the drain does not resonate at 8MHz and is not particularly matched to either the FET or the 50 Ohm load. I looked at a lot of class E app notes and picked one. I started with approx values and changed them incrementally to try to have a better result. What is the inductance of the loop? Alternatively, what size is it? This last is more important because it subsumes the radiation resistance that must be known to perform any efficiency computation. The loop is 65x25mm The two circuits are very, very different from each other to be achieving the same purpose. The 50 Ohm resistor, as an equivalent load appears to be grossly in error. Yes. This is the problem. The first one was to test if I was able to make a working class-E amplifier. The second one is really bad. I have a third one where the loop is connected in place of the resistor which is somewhat better but still not good. By all appearances of the magenta trace, you are running Class B or a very long Class C. This is not a hallmark of high efficiency. However, not knowing where this trace resides in the circuit, this is simply a guess. The C2 trace (the drain voltage) looks like the one expected for a class E IMO. Marc |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |