Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
Unfortunately there are no 'magic' lengths for your loop. Something in the neighborhood of 520 feet should work well on 160 meters, 250 - 260 feet for 80 meters. The limiting factor is the 'MatchBox', it doesn't have the impedance tuning range other tuners have because of the small number of inductance taps it uses. (It's 'big brother' has the same limitations, by the way.) The 'MatchBox' being a real 'balanced' tuner is nice, but just not that big'a deal for all practical purposes. In general (meaning that there are always exceptions) the largest loop you can get into the air is the way to go, if you cn 'match' it... 'Doc |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I shall give it a try and see what happens. Is what you mention
the reason some homebrewers build there own matching networks? Man, in the old days I remember there were a lot of those large var. caps. in the ham shacks, but not anymore. Palstar has a nice unit, but we are talking much bigger investment. Basically, I am just putting up the antennas which I can get away with given the boundry conditions at the qth. Whatever I get, I am sure will be interesting. At this point, I can, at various points here put up the loop, and up on the hill in another "shack" I can probably fit in a double extended Zepp (again with the ladder line). If I can get my archery chops perfected there is still the possibility of a 160M OCF into a tall Eucalytus tree and spanning to a mast on the side of another chicken house. Each antenna situation, will be like an expedition to another little shack on the property, could be fun. Bill K6TAJ 'Doc wrote: Bill, Unfortunately there are no 'magic' lengths for your loop. Something in the neighborhood of 520 feet should work well on 160 meters, 250 - 260 feet for 80 meters. The limiting factor is the 'MatchBox', it doesn't have the impedance tuning range other tuners have because of the small number of inductance taps it uses. (It's 'big brother' has the same limitations, by the way.) The 'MatchBox' being a real 'balanced' tuner is nice, but just not that big'a deal for all practical purposes. In general (meaning that there are always exceptions) the largest loop you can get into the air is the way to go, if you cn 'match' it... 'Doc |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
I'm not familiar with the 'Palstar', so can't say how 'suitable' it would be. There are a number of the 'older' (used/cheap) tuners that should work fine, though. I have an old Dentron 'MT-3000' that will match almost anything you can hook to it, for example. Something of that nature wouldn't be quite the inve$tment of a 'Palstar' (maybe?). You're right, there used to be many more of the 'bread- slicer' sized variable capacitors around than now. They were used for a lot of different applications where high voltages were present (as in matching 'odd' impedances). You also have other options, changing feed line lengths to the loop for various bands. Not exactly the easiest thing to do, but it certainly will work. Or, experimenting to find a 'magic' feed line length that is a good compromise for multiband use. Ask Cecil about that... 'Doc PS - If you happen to run across a dump truck load of those old 'bread slicers' I would gladly take them off your hands...(he said with $$$ dancing in his eyes). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doc,
If a rig has automatic antenna tuning, even like the older Kenwood TS-850SAT, how does that usually work if you have a balanced feed line? Would you still use a balanced antenna tuner in addition, or would you override the auto tune in the radio, or would the radio be able to handle it? PS, concerning murphy's law or somesuch, I have been waiting to put my coax from the 80m OCF, in some conduit through the field to my house. I even said to myself "watch out while you mow", but there is something hypnotic about the mower and me being slightly a geezer (Doh! as I slap myself on the head), sure enough, I mowed right over it, so now I have to run an extension cord out to the field so I can do some soldering, I assume they make a female to female bulkhead connection or something, I will check at the local electronics store tomorrow, of course those connectors will not fit inside the conduit I have...etc. Sometimes I think I have the short term memory of a gnat. 'Doc wrote: Bill, I'm not familiar with the 'Palstar', so can't say how 'suitable' it would be. There are a number of the 'older' (used/cheap) tuners that should work fine, though. I have an old Dentron 'MT-3000' that will match almost anything you can hook to it, for example. Something of that nature wouldn't be quite the inve$tment of a 'Palstar' (maybe?). You're right, there used to be many more of the 'bread- slicer' sized variable capacitors around than now. They were used for a lot of different applications where high voltages were present (as in matching 'odd' impedances). You also have other options, changing feed line lengths to the loop for various bands. Not exactly the easiest thing to do, but it certainly will work. Or, experimenting to find a 'magic' feed line length that is a good compromise for multiband use. Ask Cecil about that... 'Doc PS - If you happen to run across a dump truck load of those old 'bread slicers' I would gladly take them off your hands...(he said with $$$ dancing in his eyes). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
Not all 'auto-tuners' are built equally. Meaning that the '850's tuner may or may not work with balanced feed line. (I have two radios with auto tuners, neither will handle the balanced feed line, even using a balun. One of them is an '850', best radio Kenwood ever made!). It depends on what the range of impedances the tuner is able to handle, and what the antenna system presents to it. It's certainly possible, but I wouldn't count on it. If money were no object, and if I had the required building skills, I'd have a 'balanced tuner' that would handle anything I could hook to it. But! My 'lazy' out weighs my desire, and to be honest, I can't tell the difference in not using a balanced tuner. (My loop isn't anything near 'optimum' in where it is and how high it is, by the way, so using a balanced tuner just isn't going to make much difference. It does what I ask of it, so who cares.) 'Doc PS - There are only two kinds of people who use feed lines in/on the ground. Those who have run over it with a lawn mower, and those who will run over it with a lawn mower... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Doc, Coax to 80m Windom is now repaired (carefully spliced together) and now entirely in conduit and water tight. Tomorrow I will bury it in the ground, I learned my lesson about mowers. At this point the skywire loop is a project in process. One mast is up, four more to go. It will probably take most of the summer to finish this antenna. I also have another antenna in the works, and today I got a string at the local archery shop, if you get my drift. This one, a 160OCF will be hoisted at one end to a rather tall Eucalyptus (100' plus) and will span across a field about 270' to another 40-50' mast. This antenna will have to be used in a portable shack out in the field since it is too far from the house to run a cable. As you can see I am at that point where I am a bit obsessed with antenna farming. If all goes well I will give the 80m Windom (OCF) a try this weekend and will report back with the experience. Meanwhile I am thinking ahead about radios and the Knwd 850 did look like a good one, as you affirmed. I see that they had a TS-850S and a TS-850SAT, the latter being the one with the built in tuner. I was just wondering if the SAT was the one to shoot for or if the model without the tuner was equally worthwhile to pursue. Bill K6TAJ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
The plain old '850 is a very nice radio. If I had my 'druthers', any radio I bought would have an auto-tuner built in. May not use it, but having the ability is always nice, and you never know... 'Doc |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Element Design with Loading Coils | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Quad length ??? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |