Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 09:17 AM
'Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill,
Unfortunately there are no 'magic' lengths for your
loop. Something in the neighborhood of 520 feet should
work well on 160 meters, 250 - 260 feet for 80 meters.
The limiting factor is the 'MatchBox', it doesn't have
the impedance tuning range other tuners have because of
the small number of inductance taps it uses. (It's 'big
brother' has the same limitations, by the way.) The
'MatchBox' being a real 'balanced' tuner is nice, but just
not that big'a deal for all practical purposes.
In general (meaning that there are always exceptions) the
largest loop you can get into the air is the way to go, if
you cn 'match' it...
'Doc
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 10:45 PM
zeno
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I shall give it a try and see what happens. Is what you mention
the reason some homebrewers build there own matching networks?
Man, in the old days I remember there were a lot of those large
var. caps. in the ham shacks, but not anymore.

Palstar has a nice unit, but we are talking much bigger
investment. Basically, I am just putting up the antennas which
I can get away with given the boundry conditions at the qth.
Whatever I get, I am sure will be interesting. At this point, I
can, at various points here put up the loop, and up on the hill
in another "shack" I can probably fit in a double extended Zepp
(again with the ladder line). If I can get my archery chops
perfected there is still the possibility of a 160M OCF into a
tall Eucalytus tree and spanning to a mast on the side of
another chicken house. Each antenna situation, will be like an
expedition to another little shack on the property, could be
fun.


Bill K6TAJ

'Doc wrote:

Bill,
Unfortunately there are no 'magic' lengths for your
loop. Something in the neighborhood of 520 feet should
work well on 160 meters, 250 - 260 feet for 80 meters.
The limiting factor is the 'MatchBox', it doesn't have
the impedance tuning range other tuners have because of
the small number of inductance taps it uses. (It's 'big
brother' has the same limitations, by the way.) The
'MatchBox' being a real 'balanced' tuner is nice, but just
not that big'a deal for all practical purposes.
In general (meaning that there are always exceptions) the
largest loop you can get into the air is the way to go, if
you cn 'match' it...
'Doc


  #3   Report Post  
Old May 12th 04, 03:29 PM
'Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill,
I'm not familiar with the 'Palstar', so can't say how
'suitable' it would be. There are a number of the 'older'
(used/cheap) tuners that should work fine, though. I have
an old Dentron 'MT-3000' that will match almost anything
you can hook to it, for example. Something of that nature
wouldn't be quite the inve$tment of a 'Palstar' (maybe?).
You're right, there used to be many more of the 'bread-
slicer' sized variable capacitors around than now. They
were used for a lot of different applications where high
voltages were present (as in matching 'odd' impedances).
You also have other options, changing feed line lengths
to the loop for various bands. Not exactly the easiest
thing to do, but it certainly will work. Or, experimenting
to find a 'magic' feed line length that is a good compromise
for multiband use. Ask Cecil about that...
'Doc

PS - If you happen to run across a dump truck load of those
old 'bread slicers' I would gladly take them off your
hands...(he said with $$$ dancing in his eyes).
  #4   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 07:33 AM
zeno
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doc,

If a rig has automatic antenna tuning, even like the older
Kenwood TS-850SAT, how does that usually work if you have a
balanced feed line? Would you still use a balanced antenna
tuner in addition, or would you override the auto tune in the
radio, or would the radio be able to handle it?

PS, concerning murphy's law or somesuch, I have been waiting to
put my coax from the 80m OCF, in some conduit through the field
to my house. I even said to myself "watch out while you mow",
but there is something hypnotic about the mower and me being
slightly a geezer (Doh! as I slap myself on the head), sure
enough, I mowed right over it, so now I have to run an
extension cord out to the field so I can do some soldering, I
assume they make a female to female bulkhead connection or
something, I will check at the local electronics store
tomorrow, of course those connectors will not fit inside the
conduit I have...etc. Sometimes I think I have the short term
memory of a gnat.

'Doc wrote:

Bill,
I'm not familiar with the 'Palstar', so can't say how
'suitable' it would be. There are a number of the 'older'
(used/cheap) tuners that should work fine, though. I have
an old Dentron 'MT-3000' that will match almost anything
you can hook to it, for example. Something of that nature
wouldn't be quite the inve$tment of a 'Palstar' (maybe?).
You're right, there used to be many more of the 'bread-
slicer' sized variable capacitors around than now. They
were used for a lot of different applications where high
voltages were present (as in matching 'odd' impedances).
You also have other options, changing feed line lengths
to the loop for various bands. Not exactly the easiest
thing to do, but it certainly will work. Or, experimenting
to find a 'magic' feed line length that is a good compromise
for multiband use. Ask Cecil about that...
'Doc

PS - If you happen to run across a dump truck load of those
old 'bread slicers' I would gladly take them off your
hands...(he said with $$$ dancing in his eyes).


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 05:50 PM
'Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill,
Not all 'auto-tuners' are built equally. Meaning that
the '850's tuner may or may not work with balanced feed
line. (I have two radios with auto tuners, neither will
handle the balanced feed line, even using a balun. One of
them is an '850', best radio Kenwood ever made!). It
depends on what the range of impedances the tuner is able
to handle, and what the antenna system presents to it. It's
certainly possible, but I wouldn't count on it. If money were
no object, and if I had the required building skills, I'd
have a 'balanced tuner' that would handle anything I could hook
to it. But! My 'lazy' out weighs my desire, and to be honest,
I can't tell the difference in not using a balanced tuner. (My
loop isn't anything near 'optimum' in where it is and how high
it is, by the way, so using a balanced tuner just isn't going
to make much difference. It does what I ask of it, so who
cares.)
'Doc

PS - There are only two kinds of people who use feed lines in/on
the ground. Those who have run over it with a lawn mower, and
those who will run over it with a lawn mower...


  #6   Report Post  
Old May 14th 04, 05:38 AM
zeno
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Doc,

Coax to 80m Windom is now repaired (carefully spliced together) and
now entirely in conduit and water tight. Tomorrow I will bury it in
the ground, I learned my lesson about mowers.

At this point the skywire loop is a project in process. One mast is
up, four more to go. It will probably take most of the summer to
finish this antenna. I also have another antenna in the works, and
today I got a string at the local archery shop, if you get my
drift. This one, a 160OCF will be hoisted at one end to a rather
tall Eucalyptus (100' plus) and will span across a field about 270'
to another 40-50' mast. This antenna will have to be used in a
portable shack out in the field since it is too far from the house
to run a cable. As you can see I am at that point where I am a bit
obsessed with antenna farming. If all goes well I will give the 80m
Windom (OCF) a try this weekend and will report back with the
experience.

Meanwhile I am thinking ahead about radios and the Knwd 850 did
look like a good one, as you affirmed. I see that they had a
TS-850S and a TS-850SAT, the latter being the one with the built in
tuner. I was just wondering if the SAT was the one to shoot for or
if the model without the tuner was equally worthwhile to pursue.

Bill K6TAJ

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 14th 04, 06:06 AM
'Doc
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill,
The plain old '850 is a very nice radio. If I had
my 'druthers', any radio I bought would have an auto-tuner
built in. May not use it, but having the ability is always
nice, and you never know...
'Doc
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Element Design with Loading Coils George Antenna 7 April 24th 04 06:00 PM
Question on antenna symantics Jimmy Antenna 28 January 27th 04 01:10 AM
Coax length - important ? Keven Matthews Antenna 44 January 10th 04 11:48 AM
Quad length ??? Johnny V. Mullins Antenna 4 November 12th 03 10:01 PM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017