Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/1/2011 10:11 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
For a given physical size antenna, high gain antennas imply narrow bandwidth and critical construction. On the other foot, low gain antennas, such as the biquad, is fairly broadband, and therefore not particularly critical to construct. What's fun is to attach the antenna to a reflection coefficient bridge or directional coupler, http://pe2er.nl/wifiswr/ http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/rlb/texscan.png http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/rlb/ sweep generator, and oscilloscope to look at the VSWR curve. Then try moving things around. On my crowded workbench, location of the antenna relative to the highly reflective test equipment make a huge difference. The changes do not really have a big effect on antenna operation, but they certainly present a different picture as compared to the nice clean curves on the data sheets. You're building a CW radar, basically. That's how near field ranges work, too. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter | Antenna | |||
MFJ-868 SWR/Wattmeter | Antenna | |||
Wattmeter help | Antenna | |||
WTB: LDG DWM-4 wattmeter | Swap | |||
FS: HF/VHF/UHF wattmeter, URM-120 | Swap |