Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:40:47 -0700, Roy Lewallen
wrote: However, the feedpoint radiation resistance of a half wave vertical is very high -- typically higher than the ground resistance. For a given power input, a relatively small current flows into the base of the antenna, so very little current flows in the ground. Consequently, the ground loss is low, and there's no need to decrease its resistance with radials. From a practical view point you are correct, but for those who wish to nit-pick adding radials will, according to NEC, result in an increase in performance. At about 0.35-wavelength from the base of the ½-wave monopole the ground current peaks ( Brown, Lewis and Eastein) . The ground losses are just further away from the base of the antenna. Modeling I found that comparing a full-bore ground system (120 half-wavelength radials) to a single eight-foot ground rod (average ground) the difference reported was about 1 dB. Considering the cost difference, for me, there are more practical ways of gaining 1 dB. Danny, K6MHE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |