| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
They are even easier WITHOUT the unessessary over-complication of the chart. Why do you think the chart is "over-complicated". I have one with the R,X values and only the to/from wavelength circles outside. I deleted everything else from the Smith Chart program. What I find convenient is to carry the image of the Smith Chart around in my head. I'm more of a visual person than a formula person and that image has helped me tremendously. A student's valuable time is much better spent learning about transmissiom lines instead of how to use an antique chart. The answer can be worked out in the head in less than a second. Tan(45) = 1.0000000 and therefore X = Zo. How about 0.07 wavelength in your head? :-) I can glance at a Smith Chart faster than you can pick up a calculator. Sorry to hear about your pH problem. Isn't there an ant-acid preparation available in this modern day and age? Prilosec OTC works well. Then I can drink twice as much as usual [hic]. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||