Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Crazy George" wrote in message
... "Jack Painter" snip Btw I had a Power Quality engineer that I was discussing ground line impedances with remind me that the same 1/4 wave phenomenon can happen in runs of ground and bonding too. The same radial or parallel or "web" of connections alleviates that risk with lightning grounding as it does with RF grounding. Jack Jack: Alleviates? NO! Reduces somewhat, maybe, and that is one of the most difficult things to get across to people with little theoretical knowledge. Even if it were the perfectly conducting sphere so loved in textbooks, impedance still exists, and the instantaneous voltage at point A will be different from point B. All you are doing is increasing the current carrying capability, so it is less likely to blow up due to a direct strike. Instantaneous voltage difference with respect to a remote reference can still rise to a gazillion volts, no matter how much copper you put in there, or how you configure it. George, thanks for your reply. But in Webster's Dictionary: Alliviate: To make less hard to bear; to reduce or decrease. That's exactly why I used that word. And, after all the absolutely invaluable help available from experts on this group, I still consulted a Professional for the specifics of my site requirements. And common bonding everything becomes more important than whatever impedance ground has between any two points in the entire system. A properly bonded and grounded system does not care what impedance or voltage is present on the system. Please don't make me define properly. ;-) 73's Jack. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |