| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 18 May 2004 20:05:37 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: Why do you feel modeling is "so unreliable"? ========================= Because 99.99 percent of models are never properly tested in practice and in an anateur's back yard, if they WERE tested, the radiation patterns would only bear a vague resemblance to predictions. Predictions are mostly wishful thinking. Nevertheless, they can be a satisfying intellectual activity. ---- Reg. I see........ Then I assume then that your diagnosis of computer modeling applies to your antenna computer programs as well? Danny |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Plans for a 5/8 wave 2M ground plane | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||