Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/26/2011 2:07 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:13:26 -0700, Jim wrote: I think one can safely assume that the folks doing the experiment are aware of all those potential error sources. The odds are distinctly against that being true. At the end of the day, the measurement is going to expose a design flaw (recall the Hubble Lens?), not shake the foundations of Physics. Almost certainly you're right. But as far as the error sources referenced in the older post (solid earth tides, etc.): those have been taken into account. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chinese Spies Penetrate New York Times | Shortwave | |||
The New York Times Shortwave Article | Shortwave | |||
New York Times artical on BPL | General | |||
OT, but important -- Worm alert in today's New York Times | Homebrew |