LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 27th 11, 10:05 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
Default You heard it here (before) first - FTL in the New York Times

On 9/26/2011 2:07 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:13:26 -0700, Jim
wrote:

I think one can safely assume that the folks doing the experiment are
aware of all those potential error sources.


The odds are distinctly against that being true.

At the end of the day, the measurement is going to expose a design
flaw (recall the Hubble Lens?), not shake the foundations of Physics.


Almost certainly you're right. But as far as the error sources
referenced in the older post (solid earth tides, etc.): those have been
taken into account.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chinese Spies Penetrate New York Times SeeingEyeDog Shortwave 0 October 6th 05 12:11 AM
The New York Times Shortwave Article § Dr. Artaud § Shortwave 5 March 22nd 05 11:57 AM
New York Times artical on BPL Victor General 4 July 13th 04 04:45 PM
OT, but important -- Worm alert in today's New York Times John Walton Homebrew 0 August 13th 03 01:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017