Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote
Richard, I have no reason to doubt anything you say. I have no reason to doubt what I have said. But why imply there's serious disagreement when there is none? _______________________ Clips from our previous posts (below) - I don't know what constitutes a "serious disagreement" to you, Reg, but I think most readers would say that we have opposite conclusions about this topic. If you have no reason to doubt what I wrote about this, how can you continue to support what you wrote? Our statements are mutually exclusive. YOU: "Provided the mechanical connection is sound, you can use any coaxial connectors you like, regardless of nominal impedance, at frequencies less than about 300 MHz without any observed ill effects. A connector less than 1" long of impedance 51.5 ohms in a 50 ohm system will NOT produce an SWR of 1.03:1 or anything anywhere near to it at frequencies less than 1000 MHz." ME: "This PRACTICAL experience illustrates that an impedance change even in a 54-60MHz TV channel occurring within a physical space of less than one inch can produce important and commercially supportable system benefits, despite your statements quoted above." - RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Lightning Arrester | Antenna | |||
R/S Solderless BNC Connectors: How Can They Possibly Work Well ? | Antenna | |||
SMA to TV Coax connectors hard to find? | Antenna | |||
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question | Antenna |