Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suppose my square loop antenna oxidizes. Does that affect its
characteristics? Thanks, John KD5YI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John S wrote:
Suppose my square loop antenna oxidizes. Does that affect its characteristics? Yes. Its color changes :-) Beyond that - as far as RF characteristics go - the answer is probably "Yes, but probably not enough that you would be able to detect the difference in practice." What I believe would happen: (1) As the surface oxidizes, its resistance rises. This will cause some amount of additional signal loss, as current flows through the resistive layer. The actual amount of added loss will depend on the depth of the oxidized layer, its actual resistance per square compared to that of the underlying copper, and on the frequency (which influences the *skin depth" of the material). Interestingly, the greatest amount of added loss does *not* occur when the oxide layer's resistance is at a maximum (near- infinite), since little or no current will flow through the oxide... it becomes "invisible", and the current will flow through the metallic copper under the oxide. The losses are highest when the oxide layer is (1) of moderate resistance, and (2) fairly thick, compared to the skin depth. At this point, most of the current will be flowing through the oxide, and excluded from the metallic copper by the skin effect. I don't know the actual numbers involved here (i.e. point of greatest loss, for any given frequency). In practice I don't think you'll come anywhere near these conditions for a copper-wire antenna at UHF frequencies. (2) Copper oxide is not electrically linear - it behaves somewhat like a semiconductor (you can actually make a diode out of it). This nonlinearity may result in the generation of some second- and higher-order harmonics, and possibly some intermodulation products, if a significant amount of current is flowing through the oxide layer. I doubt that this will be detectable. (3) If you manage to get oxidation into your actual metal-to-metal contacts (and not just on the surface of the metal) the problem in (2) becomes a lot worse, since you can have *all* of your signal power flowing through what amounts to a diode. Harmonics and IM products can become much more of a problem. In practice, I'd say that if you make sure that (3) is not a problem... that is, all of your actual metal-to-metal contacts are soldered or welded (or gooped with a conductive anti-oxidant paste prior to assembly) you'll be OK, electrically. Surface oxidation on the loop is unlikely to be a problem. You could always scrub down the loop with Brasso, wash it carefully and dry it, and then spray it with an industrial- strength outdoor-rated UV-proof clearcoat. That would leave it shiny and bright for quite a long time. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/2011 1:17 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
In , John wrote: Suppose my square loop antenna oxidizes. Does that affect its characteristics? Yes. Its color changes :-) Beyond that - as far as RF characteristics go - the answer is probably "Yes, but probably not enough that you would be able to detect the difference in practice." What I believe would happen: (1) As the surface oxidizes, its resistance rises. This will cause some amount of additional signal loss, as current flows through the resistive layer. The actual amount of added loss will depend on the depth of the oxidized layer, its actual resistance per square compared to that of the underlying copper, and on the frequency (which influences the *skin depth" of the material). Interestingly, the greatest amount of added loss does *not* occur when the oxide layer's resistance is at a maximum (near- infinite), since little or no current will flow through the oxide... it becomes "invisible", and the current will flow through the metallic copper under the oxide. The losses are highest when the oxide layer is (1) of moderate resistance, and (2) fairly thick, compared to the skin depth. At this point, most of the current will be flowing through the oxide, and excluded from the metallic copper by the skin effect. I don't know the actual numbers involved here (i.e. point of greatest loss, for any given frequency). In practice I don't think you'll come anywhere near these conditions for a copper-wire antenna at UHF frequencies. (2) Copper oxide is not electrically linear - it behaves somewhat like a semiconductor (you can actually make a diode out of it). This nonlinearity may result in the generation of some second- and higher-order harmonics, and possibly some intermodulation products, if a significant amount of current is flowing through the oxide layer. I doubt that this will be detectable. (3) If you manage to get oxidation into your actual metal-to-metal contacts (and not just on the surface of the metal) the problem in (2) becomes a lot worse, since you can have *all* of your signal power flowing through what amounts to a diode. Harmonics and IM products can become much more of a problem. In practice, I'd say that if you make sure that (3) is not a problem... that is, all of your actual metal-to-metal contacts are soldered or welded (or gooped with a conductive anti-oxidant paste prior to assembly) you'll be OK, electrically. Surface oxidation on the loop is unlikely to be a problem. You could always scrub down the loop with Brasso, wash it carefully and dry it, and then spray it with an industrial- strength outdoor-rated UV-proof clearcoat. That would leave it shiny and bright for quite a long time. My prior 'Net search revealed opinions from at least two camps, so I thought I'd ask here. Color, I'll check with my decorator :-) Item (3), connections will be soldered. I will be using #14 gauge wire as used in house wiring. I could leave the insulation on the wire, but moisture has a habit of wicking into the tiniest exposed crevice, as you are aware, and I'd rather not have to perform heroic efforts to prevent oxidation. By removing the insulation, I can at least observe the severity of oxidation and guess at whether it correlates to any observed communication problems. Thanks for the complete and thoughtful answer, Dave. You have persuaded me to proceed without worry. 73, John KD5YI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/2011 12:11 PM, John S wrote:
On 11/4/2011 1:17 PM, Dave Platt wrote: In , John wrote: Suppose my square loop antenna oxidizes. Does that affect its characteristics? Yes. Its color changes :-) Beyond that - as far as RF characteristics go - the answer is probably "Yes, but probably not enough that you would be able to detect the difference in practice." What I believe would happen: (1) As the surface oxidizes, its resistance rises. This will cause some amount of additional signal loss, as current flows through the resistive layer. The actual amount of added loss will depend on the depth of the oxidized layer, its actual resistance per square compared to that of the underlying copper, and on the frequency (which influences the *skin depth" of the material). Interestingly, the greatest amount of added loss does *not* occur when the oxide layer's resistance is at a maximum (near- infinite), since little or no current will flow through the oxide... it becomes "invisible", and the current will flow through the metallic copper under the oxide. The losses are highest when the oxide layer is (1) of moderate resistance, and (2) fairly thick, compared to the skin depth. At this point, most of the current will be flowing through the oxide, and excluded from the metallic copper by the skin effect. I don't know the actual numbers involved here (i.e. point of greatest loss, for any given frequency). In practice I don't think you'll come anywhere near these conditions for a copper-wire antenna at UHF frequencies. (2) Copper oxide is not electrically linear - it behaves somewhat like a semiconductor (you can actually make a diode out of it). This nonlinearity may result in the generation of some second- and higher-order harmonics, and possibly some intermodulation products, if a significant amount of current is flowing through the oxide layer. I doubt that this will be detectable. (3) If you manage to get oxidation into your actual metal-to-metal contacts (and not just on the surface of the metal) the problem in (2) becomes a lot worse, since you can have *all* of your signal power flowing through what amounts to a diode. Harmonics and IM products can become much more of a problem. In practice, I'd say that if you make sure that (3) is not a problem... that is, all of your actual metal-to-metal contacts are soldered or welded (or gooped with a conductive anti-oxidant paste prior to assembly) you'll be OK, electrically. Surface oxidation on the loop is unlikely to be a problem. You could always scrub down the loop with Brasso, wash it carefully and dry it, and then spray it with an industrial- strength outdoor-rated UV-proof clearcoat. That would leave it shiny and bright for quite a long time. My prior 'Net search revealed opinions from at least two camps, so I thought I'd ask here. Color, I'll check with my decorator :-) Item (3), connections will be soldered. I will be using #14 gauge wire as used in house wiring. I could leave the insulation on the wire, but moisture has a habit of wicking into the tiniest exposed crevice, as you are aware, and I'd rather not have to perform heroic efforts to prevent oxidation. By removing the insulation, I can at least observe the severity of oxidation and guess at whether it correlates to any observed communication problems. Thanks for the complete and thoughtful answer, Dave. You have persuaded me to proceed without worry. 73, John KD5YI Loops are good! I have a full wave 160 meter loop, horizontal, at 35ft. The copper begins to turn color within a month or so. I see your address is Plano, TX. If you are down wind from any chemical companies or oil refineries or houses that use oil heat, or even natural gas users, the antenna and soldered connections will not just oxidize, but will have other chemical reactions to the sulfur and other acids in the air. When I lived in Portland, Oregon, years ago, we and all the neighbors had oil heat. She sulfur from burning oil caused lots of corrosion on copper and soldered connections. Hope you have better results. As noted, clear plastic spray will help a lot on the soldered parts. Paul, KD7HB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/4/2011 9:25 PM, Paul Drahn wrote:
On 11/4/2011 12:11 PM, John S wrote: On 11/4/2011 1:17 PM, Dave Platt wrote: In , John wrote: Suppose my square loop antenna oxidizes. Does that affect its characteristics? Yes. Its color changes :-) Beyond that - as far as RF characteristics go - the answer is probably "Yes, but probably not enough that you would be able to detect the difference in practice." What I believe would happen: (1) As the surface oxidizes, its resistance rises. This will cause some amount of additional signal loss, as current flows through the resistive layer. The actual amount of added loss will depend on the depth of the oxidized layer, its actual resistance per square compared to that of the underlying copper, and on the frequency (which influences the *skin depth" of the material). Interestingly, the greatest amount of added loss does *not* occur when the oxide layer's resistance is at a maximum (near- infinite), since little or no current will flow through the oxide... it becomes "invisible", and the current will flow through the metallic copper under the oxide. The losses are highest when the oxide layer is (1) of moderate resistance, and (2) fairly thick, compared to the skin depth. At this point, most of the current will be flowing through the oxide, and excluded from the metallic copper by the skin effect. I don't know the actual numbers involved here (i.e. point of greatest loss, for any given frequency). In practice I don't think you'll come anywhere near these conditions for a copper-wire antenna at UHF frequencies. (2) Copper oxide is not electrically linear - it behaves somewhat like a semiconductor (you can actually make a diode out of it). This nonlinearity may result in the generation of some second- and higher-order harmonics, and possibly some intermodulation products, if a significant amount of current is flowing through the oxide layer. I doubt that this will be detectable. (3) If you manage to get oxidation into your actual metal-to-metal contacts (and not just on the surface of the metal) the problem in (2) becomes a lot worse, since you can have *all* of your signal power flowing through what amounts to a diode. Harmonics and IM products can become much more of a problem. In practice, I'd say that if you make sure that (3) is not a problem... that is, all of your actual metal-to-metal contacts are soldered or welded (or gooped with a conductive anti-oxidant paste prior to assembly) you'll be OK, electrically. Surface oxidation on the loop is unlikely to be a problem. You could always scrub down the loop with Brasso, wash it carefully and dry it, and then spray it with an industrial- strength outdoor-rated UV-proof clearcoat. That would leave it shiny and bright for quite a long time. My prior 'Net search revealed opinions from at least two camps, so I thought I'd ask here. Color, I'll check with my decorator :-) Item (3), connections will be soldered. I will be using #14 gauge wire as used in house wiring. I could leave the insulation on the wire, but moisture has a habit of wicking into the tiniest exposed crevice, as you are aware, and I'd rather not have to perform heroic efforts to prevent oxidation. By removing the insulation, I can at least observe the severity of oxidation and guess at whether it correlates to any observed communication problems. Thanks for the complete and thoughtful answer, Dave. You have persuaded me to proceed without worry. 73, John KD5YI Loops are good! I have a full wave 160 meter loop, horizontal, at 35ft. The copper begins to turn color within a month or so. I see your address is Plano, TX. If you are down wind from any chemical companies or oil refineries or houses that use oil heat, or even natural gas users, the antenna and soldered connections will not just oxidize, but will have other chemical reactions to the sulfur and other acids in the air. Plano is north of Dallas. The prevailing winds are from the south. That says it all. When I lived in Portland, Oregon, years ago, we and all the neighbors had oil heat. She sulfur from burning oil caused lots of corrosion on copper and soldered connections. Hope you have better results. As noted, clear plastic spray will help a lot on the soldered parts. Paul, KD7HB The antenna looks like a diamond and is only about 1 foot in its greatest dimension. It will be mounted no more than 6 feet above ground. If I give it some thought, I can probably design the whole project such that the antenna can be replaced without too much trouble. Thanks for your input, Paul. 73, John KD5YI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Novel source for copper antenna wire | Homebrew | |||
Why is copper better than steel for wire antenna? | Antenna | |||
FS 19 Strand 1/4" OD All copper Antenna Wire | Shortwave | |||
FS 19 Strand 1/4" OD All Copper Antenna Wire | Antenna | |||
FS 19 Strand 1/4" OD All Copper Antenna Wire | Swap |