Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 16th 04, 11:49 PM
JGBOYLES
 
Posts: n/a
Default

According to a QST review about 20 years ago, the B&Ws are comparable
to a standard dipole from 20 meters and up; much less efficient than a
standard dipole, below 20 meters.


Yep, a short 80m antenna does ok on 20m. The Military, in their quest to get a
signal out, in the smallest space possible devised a scheme that used a very
inefficient antenna. From what I have read, it was a 20 kw transmitter with
matching auto-tuner that tuned from 2-30 mhz.
One makes up for the -6db loss on 4mhz with brute force. The B&W has 6db or
more loss on 80m. As a ham, I hope my antenna is very efficient. When I am
mobile that is not possible, but fixed, I want an efficient antenna.


73 Gary N4AST
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Moble HF Antenna - Suggestions / Comments? KD5SRL Antenna 3 February 28th 04 11:55 AM
Good HF Antenna and Location on Semi? Jeff Antenna 3 January 16th 04 09:10 PM
APS 13 DX Antenna with a good 70s tuner DJboutit2 Antenna 0 January 8th 04 07:45 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Super Broomstick....Any good? Bill Antenna 15 August 6th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017