Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dave wrote: no, only that you ignored the body of the message and answered what you wanted to discuss instead of what was asked. Yes, I did. I didn't know anything about the original question so I kindly offered to discuss something I know something about. If that is against netnews guidelines, could you show me where it says so? of course it is against guidelines. you were starting a new thread without changing the subject. in effect hijacking the thread for your own discussion. nope, that is a real world situation, but not the one under discussion. A 1/4WL matching section is not a "real world situation"? Since when? Everything I post is a real-world situation except for the obvious, e.g. one-second long lossless transmission lines. i said it was real world, but it is not what the original thread was about. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |