Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
This was all explained 64 years ago (when I was two years old) by J. C.
Slater in _Microwave_Transmission_. Why do I have to explain it all over
again?

Possibly because you so ill understood it then as now?

Well Richard, here's your chance. Please enlighten us on J.C.
Slater's meaning of: "The method of eliminating reflections
is based on the interference between waves. ... The fundamental
principle behind the elimination of reflections is then to have
each reflected wave canceled by another wave of equal amplitude
and opposite phase."
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Mon, 24 May 2004 13:19:41 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Well Richard, here's your chance. Please enlighten us on J.C.
What was the original question? [accredited stock response]

Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
Well Richard, here's your chance. Please enlighten us on J.C.

What was the original question? [accredited stock response]

When totally ignorant, divert the issue as long as possible.
Why am I not surprised?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:06:28 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
What was the original question? [accredited stock response]
When totally ignorant, divert the issue as long as possible.
Why am I not surprised?
Are you sure this is the original question? [accredited stock
response]

Richard Clark wrote:
Are you sure this is the original question?

I am sure that our solar system and homo sapiens didn't exist
when the original question was asked.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Mon, 24 May 2004 15:28:40 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
I am sure that our solar system and homo sapiens didn't exist
when the original question was asked.
So the question is which came first, the homo or the solar system?

Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
I am sure that our solar system and homo sapiens didn't exist
when the original question was asked.

So the question is which came first, the homo or the solar system?

For what it is worth, I believe that the first homo sapien
originated about a quarter of a million years ago and was
a female with dominant genes.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Richard Clark wrote,

On Mon, 24 May 2004 15:28:40 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
I am sure that our solar system and homo sapiens didn't exist
when the original question was asked.
So the question is which came first, the homo or the solar system?


Homos before Helios, or Helios before homos? That's a profound
question which I'll have to think about over my after-dinner port. On
the surface it looks about as meaningful as "turkeys from Turlock,"
but first impressions are sometimes deceiving.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Richard Clark wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:06:28 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

What was the original question? [accredited stock response]

When totally ignorant, divert the issue as long as possible.
Why am I not surprised?

Are you sure this is the original question? [accredited stock
response]

Richard

Your earlier comment on things was quite accurate. This thread is
hilarious!

tom
K0TAR

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 13:19:41 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Well Richard, here's your chance. Please enlighten us on J.C.
What was the original question? [accredited stock response]

It's clear that R.C. loves tweeking Cecil.
Steve