Cecil Moore wrote:
You must be omnipotent in order to prove that
you are omniscient. I hope you are up to that task.

I'll try and remember that. 8-|

My challenge still stands. Please provide a standing wave without a
forward-traveling wave and a rearward-traveling wave. If you can't,
at least send me a joint of whatever you are smokin'.

Wow. Maybe I need to issue a "challenge".

How about this: If you can't prove that F does not equal m*a, then I am
right about whatever issue on which we disagree!

Is that how it works, Cecil? ;-)

73, Jim AC6XG