Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Any energy passing a point *is* power, by IEEE definition. That's an equality, not a definition. No, it is from the IEEE Dictionary. The IEEE Dictionary shows the relationship between energy passing a point and the equivalent in units of power. That is a fact. There is a real world experiment that you can perform to prove your concepts are incorrect. TV XMTR--tuner----2 uS long 600 ohm line---75 ohm TV RCVR The first ghost will occur 4 uS after the primary image. This can only be explained by part of the energy in the primary signal changing direction and momentum at the RCVR and making a round trip to the tuner and back to the RCVR. In order to make that round trip, the energy in the signal had to change direction and momentum at the tuner. (There are no reflections between the XMTR and the tuner.) Likewise, the second ghost will occur 8 uS after the primary image, indicating four reversals of direction and momentum of the energy contained in the second ghost. Proving that reflections actually exist, and that when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Are you trying to prove something, or disprove it with your ghost story? You're not generating a clear picture. ;-) 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
BPL a reality in my area now! | Antenna | |||
Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||
Reference for basic antenna theory | Antenna |