And I didn't read any of the stuff any of you quote from. Just using a
solid understanding of fundamentals and applying them correctly.

We'll see whom else (dis)agrees...

Thanks for the stimulating subject. Gets the remainder of the gray matter
really warm...
73, Steve

--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.

No single raindrop believes it is responsible for the flood.


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Steve Nosko wrote:
One wave from the transmitter (call it wave "A") hits the matching
device.
Some makes it through toward the load and some is reflected back toward
the
Tx due to the matching device's weird impedance...HOWEVER, the wave
coming
from the load has some component which makes it through the matching
section
to the input (call this wave "B"). It is wave "A" abd wave B"B which
must
be equal in amplitude and 180 degrees out - therefore cencelling for a
net
wave back toward the Tx of null, naught, zip..all is happy in the world
of
ham radio

Yep, you got it! J. C. Slater stated such in _Microwave_Transmissions_
before most present day hams were born. I'm glad you understand.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----