Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Al" wrote
The shielded three-foot diameter loop I built is for receive only. The primary loop is six turns paralleled by a variable capacitor, and the secondary (link loop) is one turn (same diameter) fed to a preamp or directly to the receiver. The band of operation of the loop is about 200kHz to 500kHz (NDB chaser). One question that is not answered in rjeloop3 is what should be the distance from the output (link) loop to the main loop? The antenna's I built used flat cable for the wiring and one of the turns was the link so the distance was 0.050 inches. In other articles I have read that the Q, gain, and S/N ratio can be varied by varying the distance between the two loops. Approximately what is the distance? Are we talking a small fraction of an inch or 2, 3, or perhaps six inches apart? I would just like a feeler distance to work with. If the distance is to be over one inch, I'm considering building the primary loop in one hoola-hoop form and the secondary loop in a second hoola-hoop then varying the distance between the hoops. Any thoughts on this or is this a waste of time and effort? ===================================== Hi Al, To have a significant effect on operating Q it is necessary to shift the coupling loop away from the main loop by more than about 1/10 of loop diameter. This is mechanically inconvenient and anyway I've forgotten how to calculate the coupling coefficient between the two coils. A more convenient way of varying coupling between main loop and receiver is to place a smaller loop inside the main loop in the same plane. Just like a Magloop transmitting loop. Additional variation can be obtained by rotating the coupling loop relative to the other. It is easier to calculate. The two loops constitute a transformer. It makes little difference wherabouts the small loop is located inside the large loop. So it can be located near the bottom of the main loop near the tuning capacitor. It is better to have no direct connection between the two loops. It may upset the natural balance between the main loop and its surroundings and ground. One side of the coupling loop is grounded at the receiver end of the line. If the line is an appreciable fraction of a wavelength (very unlikely) then use an impedance Zo in the same ballpark as the receiver input Z. It hardly matters whether it's coax or very loosely twisted pair. The transformer has an effective turns ratio of - N = (N1*D1) / (N2*D2). N1 = main loop turns. D1 = main loop diameter. N2 = coupling loop turns. D2 = coupling loop diameter. Which may be very interesting but will not be of the slightest use unless the receiver input resistance is known. RJELOOP3 calculates the parallel L and C resonant resistance of the main loop. Call this R1. To match this to the receiver input resistance R2, make N = SquareRoot(R1/R2). When impedance-matched to the main loop the receiver input resistance damps the intrinsic Q of the loop to exactly half of its unloaded value. The received signal is then maximised. Prefer to use a larger diameter for the coupling loop rather than a larger number of turns. To maximise operating Q and selectivity match the loop to 1/2 or 1/3 times the receiver's actual input resistance. There will be a few dB loss in signal strength. None of the foregoing will have any effect on signal to noise ratio except when the signal bandwidth is appreciably smaller than the bandwith accepted by the loop. But it is best to manage channel bandwidth in the IF amplifier. The natural Q of a good receiving loop at LF and MF is already high enough to spoil the audio quality of broadcast stations. --- Regards, Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
am indoor loop antenna | Antenna | |||
How was antenna formula for uV/Meter Derived? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Link coupling to a rotary incuctor | Antenna |