Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, tom wrote:


You are so much more talented than all of us here

No such claim has ever been made.

and you are so
valuable to your current employer

That I am. And I am going to stay that way too, idiot.

that there should be no problem
admitting who you are and who you work for.

I will. In person only, and you have to give your info first.
Feeling paranoid yet? That's right, asshole. I would use the info to
make the meeting less savoury than you expect. You would end up in the
sewer, where you belong, and where your mind already is.

Are you seeing the reason why Usenet is anon yet, dumb****?

tom "k0TAR" shows his immaturity level yet again. What a sad excuse for a man
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:07 -0600, tom wrote:

He really likes the word "retard".

Wonder why?

tom
K0TAR

Because 99.99999% of presumptuous assholes are exactly that.

Guess what category of asshole you fall into, retard.

Increasing Terrell presumptions shows him for the true assholehe is.
 

On 2/10/2012 10:18 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:24 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:



He was a cable grunt when Time Warner built Cube in Cincinnati,

You're a goddamned idiot, and you know nothing of my work history, much
less what position I held.

so I'd
say that he's at least 50 and still a very angry failure.


Hit. He's very sensitive in this area.

On the other hand, probably nothing. Forget it.

tom
K0TAR

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:38:44 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

I think the official minimum pull test is 55 lbs, but
I'm too lazy to Google for it now.

40 lbs outdoors, 30 lbs indoors.

http://www.scte.org/documents/pdf/standards/SCTE_124_2011.pdf
6.2.2
Axial Pull Force: The male “F” pin type connector, when
attached to cables manufactured to SCTE approved standards,
shall withstand a minimum axial pull force of 40 lbs for
outdoor and 30 lbs for indoor applications when tested
per ANSI/SCTE 99 2009, Test Method For Axial Pull
Connector/Drop Cable.

I doubt that the crimp connectors could pass the test.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:23:49 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:13:12 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

WTF are you attempting to do here, asswipe?

Inspire you to clean up your act. However, judging by your response,
you're not worth the time and effort. As you were...

You did not put forth any effort, you lying piece of ****. You had no
intention of putting forth any effort either, you lying piece of ****.
You are no different than the other asswipes, or you would have jumped on
them when their insults flew years ago. But YOU are OBLIVIOUS, boy.

You are just like all the "intelligent" cops out there. Where are the
ones complaining about the fact that Tasers are NOT non-lethal? Oh...
that's right... the retarded ****s would NEVER declare that their ****ed
in the head brethren could possibly be doing anything wrong!

Tasers should be banned completely. Assholes like you need to get a
clue, because the behavior of the idiots I deride are who you should be
going after, boy. So, essentially, you are nothing more than just
another one of them. And THAT is RETARDED. The term is NOT just for
congenital defects, idiot. Dumb****s like you, who would be otherwise
intelligent, become SELF retarded when you take steps back from your
intelligence. That is what you are doing here. That is what they did.
That is why they are retarded. That is why YOU are retarded. The term
has NEBER been about sad, dumb ****ers who got a raw deal at birth. It
has ALWAYS been about how you otherwise claim to be intelligent asswipes
act like ****ing ten year olds here. THAT IS RETARDED! You dig, boy?

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On 2/10/2012 10:30 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:


I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies.

Junk.

I was reading the CRC handbook at 11 yo.

And your point is?

I was working with fractals before you even knew what they were.

I doubt it.


I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies at 15 yo.

You are repeating yourself, sort of. Probably forgot what you typed 3
ago. Perfectly understandable.


Now, IF you know what that simple piece of gear is, you might start to
get a clue. As it stands, you are worse than a modern day stigmatic pig
from LA.

You know NOTHING about me, you stupid ****. WAKE THE **** UP, BOY!

You really are the most amusing to show up recently.

Please DO NOT go away!

tom
K0TAR

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:34:45 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

Probably unloading the defective converters from the service trucks.

The ones you designed? 99.999% drop out rate.

Bwuahahahahahahah!

Increasing Terrell presumptions shows him for the true asshole he is.
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:51:35 -0600, tom wrote:

On 2/10/2012 10:18 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:24 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:



He was a cable grunt when Time Warner built Cube in Cincinnati,

You're a goddamned idiot, and you know nothing of my work history, much
less what position I held.

so I'd
say that he's at least 50 and still a very angry failure.


Hit.

You're a goddamned retard.

He's very sensitive in this area.

I don't give a fat flying **** what you retarded stupid ****s think or
say. You got that, boy? You ****ing retard!


On the other hand, probably nothing.

That's because withered nuts don'tproduce, boy. But do please exit
here and go back to trying with your left hand. Give it some permanence.
Try until you succeed. That way, we'll be sure to never see your
retarded crap in here again.

Forget it.

Please, **** off and die, and 'forget' this group.

tom
K0TAR

Yes, YOU, ****head!

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On 2/10/2012 10:42 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, wrote:

If you are so talented that your employers don't care what you say then
tell us who you work for.

**** you, asswipe. You list your ****ing stats, boy!

Usenet is anon for a ****ing reason. To keep assholes like you away
from me AND my employers, AND to keep assholes like me from TERMINATING
retarded ****s like you as the opportunity presents itself.

Back in the old west, if a man brushed up against a man standing on the
street with his horse, the man on the street pulled out a gun and dropped
the ****er, and then his horse too!

THAT is the kind of response retarded ****s like you should get.

Man oh man you are funny!!!!


tom
K0TAR

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On 2/10/2012 10:45 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:58 -0600, wrote:


You are so much more talented than all of us here

No such claim has ever been made.

and you are so
valuable to your current employer

That I am. And I am going to stay that way too, idiot.

that there should be no problem
admitting who you are and who you work for.

I will. In person only, and you have to give your info first.
Feeling paranoid yet? That's right, asshole. I would use the info to
make the meeting less savoury than you expect. You would end up in the
sewer, where you belong, and where your mind already is.

Are you seeing the reason why Usenet is anon yet, dumb****?

Fine.

Lets do it.

tom
K0TAR