Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Jackson" napisal w wiadomosci news ![]() In message , writes Szczepan Bialek wrote: "Ian Jackson" napisal w wiadomosci ... In message , Rob writes Szczepan Bialek wrote: The "dipole" where one element is connected to "live" wire and the second to a "ground" is the monopole. It is your misunderstanding that: 1. amateurs always connect coax directly to a dipole. they don't. those that are in the know will use a balun. In the past, many amateurs did connect coax directly to a dipole. And what they do if they have the monopole? Connect it with coaxial transmission line, idiot. I think Szczepan is using the type of logic that concludes, as cats have four legs and dogs have four legs, then cats are dogs. Antenna with the four legs is used for the circullar polarization. Tell us if the your dipole ( the two legs and coax directly to a dipole) radiate the polarised waves? S* |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Antenna with the four legs is used for the circullar polarization. Sometimes. Tell us if the your dipole ( the two legs and coax directly to a dipole) radiate the polarised waves? The type of transmission line used to feed an antenna has absolutely nothing to do with what a particular antenna is or how the antenna radiates. You keep using the phrase "your dipole", which is utter nonsense. A dipole is a dipole is a dipole. A dipole will radiate circular polarization if it is not absolutely staight. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using speaker wire for a dipole | Antenna | |||
80m Dipole fed with open wire feeder. | Antenna | |||
Newbie with a wire dipole | CB | |||
Receiver dipole vs 23 ft wire for HF | Antenna | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave |