Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Ian Jackson" napisal w wiadomosci
...
In message , Gaius
writes

Anyway, I killfiled him years ago.

Where's the fun in that? In this sad world, we often need a bit of
light-hearted relief and amusement.

I am here to learn. To learn English.

Learn this English; you are a stupid, ignorant, argumentative, babbling,
ineducable idiot.

If you really want to learn English, read newspapers, magazines, and watch
TV and movies in English.

I do my best.

I would hate to see what your less than best is.

But I do not understand why in your antennas no electrons.

That is because you are a stupid, ignorant, argumentative, babbling,
ineducable idiot than instead of listening and learning argues with people
with hundreds of years of combined experience.

You also refuse to read, and reread until you really understand it, any
modern material on electromagnetics, whether from Wiki or University
level textbooks, in ANY language.

You are a joke and a laughingstock.

napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


But I do not understand why in your antennas no electrons.

That is because you are a stupid, ignorant, argumentative, babbling,
ineducable idiot than instead of listening and learning argues with people
with hundreds of years of combined experience.

You also refuse to read, and reread until you really understand it, any
modern material on electromagnetics,

In electromagnetics also no electrons. Why?
S*

wrote in message
...
Gaius wrote:

By us, of course, I don't include Szczepan. My feeing is that he's
either :

1 Far gone with senile dementia OR
2 An academic troll who's been winding up Usenet groups for years

I think (2) is more likely - dementia is progressive, and I'd expect
Szczepan's ramblings to get gradually more and more incoherent. Instead
there is a strangely consistent quality to them.

Anyway, I killfiled him years ago.


Possiblility 3; he's not very bright and he's bat **** crazy.

Hello chaps.

Regardless of the reason for his postings, Szczepan is good for a laugh (and
I don't mean that in a nasty way) and the occasional good discussion amongst
those of us who care to think about radio and electronics.
Anyone else notice that his command of English varies from posting to
posting?

73, Ian.

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


But I do not understand why in your antennas no electrons.

That is because you are a stupid, ignorant, argumentative, babbling,
ineducable idiot than instead of listening and learning argues with people
with hundreds of years of combined experience.

You also refuse to read, and reread until you really understand it, any
modern material on electromagnetics,

In electromagnetics also no electrons. Why?
S*

If your were to read, and reread until you really understand it, any modern
material on electromagnetics, you would then know what role electons play
in electromagnetics and electromagnetic fields.

Yes, electrons are involved in electromagnetic fields, but no, electrons do
NOT jump off antenna elements.

Why are you incapable of getting a University level textbook, in any
language, on electromagnetics and reading it?

Ian wrote:
wrote in message
...
Gaius wrote:

By us, of course, I don't include Szczepan. My feeing is that he's
either :

1 Far gone with senile dementia OR
2 An academic troll who's been winding up Usenet groups for years

I think (2) is more likely - dementia is progressive, and I'd expect
Szczepan's ramblings to get gradually more and more incoherent. Instead
there is a strangely consistent quality to them.

Anyway, I killfiled him years ago.


Possiblility 3; he's not very bright and he's bat **** crazy.

Hello chaps.

Regardless of the reason for his postings, Szczepan is good for a laugh (and
I don't mean that in a nasty way) and the occasional good discussion amongst
those of us who care to think about radio and electronics.
Anyone else notice that his command of English varies from posting to
posting?

73, Ian.


Looking at his posts from years ago, I don't see a lot of difference.

It appears his ability to learn English is just as bad as his ability
to learn anything else.


He is ineducable.

On 7/13/2012 12:14 AM, Brett Crapser wrote:
Boomer wrote:
On 7/11/2012 3:18 PM, Ian wrote:
"Boomer" wrote in message
...
Ian, I am pretty advanced in years. I am 69. I can remember a comedian
whose name escapes me. He got paid good money for coming on stage and
talking just like Szczepan. I think it would be a gas for him to address a
large gathering of amateur radio operators. He could have us all in
stitches in a few seconds.

[snip]
Michael

Hello Michael. From where I am sitting, 69 isn't all that old. I have
friends heading for 90 who are definitely not showing their age.
Was the comedian a Brit named Stanley Unwin or an American named Fred ???
73, Ian.

I just can't remember Ian.

Michael

Pretty sure you are talking about Professor Irwin Corey "The World's Foremost Authority".

http://www.irwincorey.org

He's 95 and still working - I'd hurry if you want him...

Brett

Yes Brett, it came back to me. It is so good to know he was an engineer.
YES professor Irwin Corey. Szczepan needs to polish up his act a
little to match the professor. He is just not quite there. I suspect he
never will be. However, he is still funny, just not as funny as the
professor. God, 95 and still working, bless his heart.

Michael

"Boomer" wrote in message
...
On 7/13/2012 12:14 AM, Brett Crapser wrote:
Boomer wrote:
On 7/11/2012 3:18 PM, Ian wrote:
"Boomer" wrote in message
...
Ian, I am pretty advanced in years. I am 69. I can remember a comedian
whose name escapes me. He got paid good money for coming on stage and
talking just like Szczepan. I think it would be a gas for him to
address a
large gathering of amateur radio operators. He could have us all in
stitches in a few seconds.

[snip]
Michael

Hello Michael. From where I am sitting, 69 isn't all that old. I have
friends heading for 90 who are definitely not showing their age.
Was the comedian a Brit named Stanley Unwin or an American named Fred
???
73, Ian.

I just can't remember Ian.

Michael

Pretty sure you are talking about Professor Irwin Corey "The World's
Foremost Authority".

http://www.irwincorey.org

He's 95 and still working - I'd hurry if you want him...

Brett

Yes Brett, it came back to me. It is so good to know he was an engineer.
YES professor Irwin Corey. Szczepan needs to polish up his act a little to
match the professor. He is just not quite there. I suspect he never will
be. However, he is still funny, just not as funny as the professor. God,
95 and still working, bless his heart.

Michael

Hello chaps.
Michael - thank you for the link to Irwin Corey. I've not heard of him at
all so I will spend some time watching the videos on his web site.
Best wishes to all for a good weekend. If you're coming to the UK for the
Olympics then I suggest some decent waterproof clothing.

73 Ian.

napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


But I do not understand why in your antennas no electrons.

That is because you are a stupid, ignorant, argumentative, babbling,
ineducable idiot than instead of listening and learning argues with
people
with hundreds of years of combined experience.

You also refuse to read, and reread until you really understand it, any
modern material on electromagnetics,

In electromagnetics also no electrons. Why?
S*

If your were to read, and reread until you really understand it, any
modern
material on electromagnetics, you would then know what role electons play
in electromagnetics and electromagnetic fields.

Yes, electrons are involved in electromagnetic fields, but no, electrons
do
NOT jump off antenna elements.

Why are you incapable of getting a University level textbook, in any
language, on electromagnetics and reading it?

" modern material on electromagnetics," is wrote by Heaviside"

"I remember my first look at the great treatise of Maxwell's when I was a
young man... I saw that it was great, greater and greatest, with prodigious
possibilities in its power... I was determined to master the book and set to
work. I was very ignorant. I had no knowledge of mathematical analysis
(having learned only school algebra and trigonometry which I had largely
forgotten) and thus my work was laid out for me. It took me several years
before I could understand as much as I possibly could. Then I set Maxwell
aside and followed my own course. And I progressed much more quickly... It
will be understood that I preach the gospel according to my interpretation
of Maxwell.[4] From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside

His "own course" is without the "electric particles". In Maxwell model were
such.
What "role electons play" in antennas (not in fields)?
S*

On Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:38:16 AM UTC-5, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
What "role electons play" in antennas (not in fields)?

You should forgive Maxwell's ignorance and join us in the 21st century. Free electrons act as a "bucket brigade" for the coherent photons which make up the quantized fields/waves surrounding the antenna conductor. If Maxwell were alive today, he would have rewritten his works to correct his ignorant mistakes. Would you still be studying his obsolete works or his new corrected works?
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

"W5DXP" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Saturday, July 14, 2012 2:38:16 AM UTC-5, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
What "role electons play" in antennas (not in fields)?

You should forgive Maxwell's ignorance and join us in the 21st century.
Free electrons act as a "bucket brigade" for the coherent photons which
make up the quantized fields/waves surrounding the antenna conductor. If
Maxwell were alive today, he would have rewritten his works to correct his
ignorant mistakes. Would you still be studying his obsolete works or his
new corrected works?

I do not studying Maxwell, Heaviside's and his new corrected works. Jimp do
it and recommend it to me.
I am in the 21st century. It is the plazma time.
S*